... The owners of the shop were not authorized to give instruction...
i resent the notion that in an unregulated industry someone should authorize anyone else to give instruction. in fact, no dive shop needs to be authorized to give instruction.
Any shop owner or individual can provide instruction. Whether that instruction is worth anything is a different subject.
The issue here is about consumer protection, stealing intellectual property, misusing trademarks and fraud, matters for civil and criminal code.
Impersonating someone else, selling counterfeit goods, misappropriating others trademarks.
If the shop certified students under its own name, they would probably been ok. The value (not the validity) of that certification might be questionable.
People start their agencies all the time - rebadge materials after a hurried and approximate editing job, enlist a bunch of instructor friends, write your own cards - that's all is necessary to start an agency, and it 's exactly how some of the most famous agencies got started.
---------- Post added February 15th, 2015 at 07:54 PM ----------
so the guy was probably an experienced diver and "could" train people how to dive but didn't have the legal qualifications to do so?
Yeah this is quite awful. I'm sure he's qualified but that's dangerous. It's almost as horrifying as if he were pretending to be a doctor. Though that would be impressive to pull off.
What is the legal qualification to train divers?
---------- Post added February 15th, 2015 at 07:57 PM ----------
I had no idea it was that easy to start your own certifying agency! I should look into starting my own agency. Is the name "Basic Scuba" taken? Or maybe "Better Scuba"? I could call it "BS" for short.
You clearly have not been diving as long as you think you have since some of the most famous brands in this industry, including some you might worship in your closet, have been started this way
---------- Post added February 15th, 2015 at 08:01 PM ----------
I don't get it.
I can see fraud if he sold cards with no training. I can see fraud if he sold training without cards.
However I can't wrap my head around why anybody would teach classes and issue cards, but not to the same people.
It sounds like some sort of bone-headed sting operation or someone got something really screwed up in the complaint.
flots.
As a matter of fact, selling cards with no training, and certainly selling training without cards, are not fraud.
It's fraud when you sell to someone something you don't have title to sell, or you sell something different from what you agreed to sell.
---------- Post added February 15th, 2015 at 08:07 PM ----------
Actually they did. I knew the place where they certified and the truth is, I believe, they were told , by the shop, not to take cheese wiz to feed the fish cause they hang at the platforms and will nip at you for food handouts. They still had thier temporary "DIVERS LICENSE." After an imidiate SI and sit down chat, they took my word that it was no longer necessary to have an instructor or DM to leave the platform. We then moved on to buoyancy and getting closer to horizontal than 45 degreees and dog paddling at depth. Yes we did it on the platform.
Its unbelieveable some of the things you hear. they had less than 10 dives in thier book, which was one of those premade 6"x6" log books, with the dive flag cover, , they also asked me what I do when the my book gets full and wont hold any more dives????? Like do I carry a spare so I can keep diving?????. I showed them my home made XL sheet log book, and it amazed them. They did not know they could dive with out a official dive book.
I did not seek this couple out . It was crouded at the lake and I shared a picnic site with them. I dont know who learned more that day me or them.
Told by the shop? was it a press release?
i love when entities like a shop or a company talk. must be one of those people-corporations that have recently been awarded personality by SCOTUS...
I'm surprised you didn't say that it was the agency's fault.
---------- Post added February 15th, 2015 at 08:14 PM ----------
While I love the defense of PADI, Where in the documentation provided did you find an accusation of endangering the students or providing bogus training??
The complaint here is about issuing selling courses and fake certification cards by an individual or group of individuals who had no right to do so.
You are absolutely right in pointing that theoretically and hypothetically, these individuals could have indeed provided top notch training.
It's just statistically improbable that someone who devises such an elaborate fraud to misrepresent his\her credentials (and the credentials issued), which in all fairness are not hard to obtain - you might well believe that the bank robber is also a model citized who pays taxes on the heist and teaches civic law to unprivileged children in between jobs.