Just a thought about teaching twinset/doubles diving...
Given that PADI specialises in single tank diving, will they struggle to find instructors who are competent in twinset diving and are fully dived up in that configuration? Would imagine that someone who's doing 5 sessions a day in the water on singles might find it challenging to run doubles slickly? Especially as valve drills take some effort and need the diver to be competent with buoyancy and finning.
Or is that easy to do?
I really do not think there is significant difference between closing the valve of a free flowing regulator mounted on a single or a twin tank.
Depending on shoulder mobility, reaching the valves of a single tank can be more difficult than reaching the valves of a twin tank. At least for me, and with my Aralu twin tank and my Cressi 15.liters steel single, reaching the valves is easier with the Aralu twin tank.
Only significant difference when switching between the two is buoyancy, as the Aralu are aluminium (Luxfer) so more buoyant than the steel single. However the Aralu are equipped with their 3kg lead prism, which can be installed between the bottom parts of the tanks. With this additional weight installed, the buoyancy is exactly the same as the 15-liters steel, and I do not need to adjust my weight belt.
Many people think that diving twin tanks is somewhat complex and challenging, while in reality the difference between a twin tank of proper size (the Aralu is 9+9 liters at 200 bars, 3600 liters) and a single tank providing a reasonable air quantity (as a 15 liters at 232 bars, 3500 liters) is truly minimal. Both have two valves, you use them with two complete and independent regulators, and the twin tank has a manifold which does not allow tank separation, so they are used exactly the same way: if one reg fails, you close its valve, and continue breathing with the other.
As said, buoyancy can be the same. And as the twin tanks are more hydrodynamic and better balanced, kicking is easier and more efficient.