Originally posted by Uncle Pug
Sudafed is a poor idea IMO...
What happens when he is at depth and it wears off...
And then he gets a reverse block on the way up...
(sigh...)
Hey Uncle Pug:
What happens when you make a 130' dive starting with only 250 psi in your tank and you run out of air on the way up? Or you plan an hour at 130' with a full AL 80 and come up short of air during deco? Obviously you should
never dive with air in your tank, right?
Sorry to pick on you, but you've hit on a pet peeve of mine. Don't blame a drug for a problem if you are using it
improperly. If you take a 4 hour Sudafed, do an hour dive 3.5 hours later, the drug is "worn off" at the end of the dive, and you get a reverse block,
it is not the drug's fault. It is the diver's fault for timing the use of the drug improperly.
And if you take a 12 or 24 hour Sudafed, do an hour dive 2 hours later, and get a squeeze on the dive, that is not the drug's fault either. The Sudafed didn't "wear off" during the dive- the diver was just too congested to dive in the first place or he just didn't equalize properly. Once again the
diver's fault for using poor judgement, not the drug's.
Decongestants in diving are a
tool. Just like any other tool you might use when you dive, they can cause problems if used
improperly. And like any other tool, if you don't know
how to use it safely, then don't use it at all. But to blame a tool for improper use is just plain
wrong IMO and blanket condemnation of its use is unwarranted. Tools can be very helpful when used correctly.
Sudafed and novice divers? See below for an example.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entr...eve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1610044&dopt=Abstract
Just my 2¢,
Bill