4 dead, 29 missing in California dive boat fire; crew jumpedCan anyone provide a link to where that was reported? I have only read it quoted second hand here, and nowhere else. (maybe I missed it in an earlier link, but I don't think so)
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
4 dead, 29 missing in California dive boat fire; crew jumpedCan anyone provide a link to where that was reported? I have only read it quoted second hand here, and nowhere else. (maybe I missed it in an earlier link, but I don't think so)
A watt is energy per second, already a measure of energy rate. So a watt per second would be energy per second per second, as if some kind of measure of acceleration. Is this what is meant, that the fire's rate of output is accelerating by 25 Watts every second?
The person sleeping in the bunk with the hatch would have known it was there. The fact that nobody got out suggests that either they were incapacitated by something (like the fire toxins) or the fire was so big and so hot before anyone alerted that nobody could make it out of the room to the ocean.
Megawatts thermal - Energy EducationI wonder why would you register to make this your first comment, but since you did: a watt is a unit of power, not energy. A watt per second is a unit of energy. That said, this is the first time I hear about using these units to quantify thermal power. BTUs (British thermal units) are more commonly used to quantify heat.
Ditto.
Roak
Do not read too much into it. People also say knots per hours and energy is usually measured in megawatt hour MWh. So correctly megawatt is already an instantaneous measure of (thermal) power output.I've seen this unit of megawatts per second used several times now and I'm trying to make sense of it.
A watt is energy per second, already a measure of energy rate. So a watt per second would be energy per second per second, as if some kind of measure of acceleration. Is this what is meant, that the fire's rate of output is accelerating by 25 Watts every second?
Brunell: "Is there any type of accelerant on the boat? I know that the tanks are very flammable, but was there any propane or anything else that would cause this type of fire?"
Fritzler: "No. On the back deck, that was one of the last things to burn, there [were] some oxygen bottles that the divers use. The rest of the scuba tanks are just air, or what we call Nitrox, which is a higher concentration. It's a 32 percent concentration that divers use, but it's a low oxygen count and they were out on the back deck and that was the last to burn. As far as the accelerant inside the boat, there is no gas, no propane, no diesel. It's all electric."
Sorry, he's right. A watt per second (as you said) is NOT energy. A watt is defined as 1 joule per second. The post he questioned has a problem.I wonder why would you register to make this your first comment, but since you did: a watt is a unit of power, not energy. A watt per second is a unit of energy. That said, this is the first time I hear about using these units to quantify thermal power. BTUs (British thermal units) are more commonly used to quantify heat.
I don't think that's a viable solution and I seriously doubt it would be considered... that would effectively ban the use of dive lights, DPVs, and cameras altogether.
Not irrelevant if someone is simply trying to understand points of fact. He said he is just trying to follow the argument. That said, I agree with your statement that people get that sort of thing wrong all the time. They sure do.This kind of details are irrelevant in such tragedy IMHO.