Originally posted by scorpiofish
You need to rethink the statement that 400 speed film would allow for greater depth of field. The speed of the film has nothing to do with DOF directly. DOF is controlled by the aperture size. Indirectly, the faster film would allow the same exposure with a smaller f-stop, which would allow a greater DOF. Of course, this in turn would negate the advantage of a faster film increasing light exposure to the film.
Scorpiofish,
I do not mean to be overbearing on this, but the shutter speed, aperature opening and ISO are all interrelated. So, if you increase the ISO you can increase the depth of field by decreasing the aperature opening. Or you can increase your ability to stop action by increasing the shutter speed. Those are direct effects of increased ISO.
I am not certain what you mean by "negating the advantage of a faster film", though. Those are the two advantages to faster film: you can stop down the aperature or you can increase the shutter speed. Or you can do both if there is enough latitude in the higher ISO. So, for example, you could use ISO 400 instead of ISO 100 and stop the lens down one f stop and increase the shutter speed by a factor of 2. That would give you a total factor of 4, consistent with "proper" exposure.
Remember, just because you increase the film speed does not mean the only variable you can "play with" is shutter speed!
Joewr...