Who’s standards? There are many ways to dive, any casualties?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Who’s standards? There are many ways to dive, any casualties?
I don't take offense to things I'm not either participating in nor when they don't affect me personally.So you consider this whole cluster of a class to be acceptable?
I have no issue with people who want to dive by arbitrary “standards” nor with people who don’t.You don’t believe a class needs to stick to published standards for max depth, gear configuration, and instructor/student ratio?
It appears these students just added a deco bottle and maybe long hose to standard recreational gear. No redundancy for a 180ft dive. Published NAUI standards are max depth of 150ft.
I have no time to be offended by things that don't matter to me.
Do you think my choice of using an air2 as an inflator is accepting deviance? Is my Air2, like my split fins and my spare air going to kill me? FTR, I don't use a spare air or split fins, but I do dive with a 13 ft3 pony, every dive, which will get me almost to the surface on those very deep dives.Not being dead often reinforces normalization of deviance. We all wear big boy/girl pants. We can dive however we choose based upon the level of risk we wish to accept. When it comes to teaching, then there is a responsibility to teach within one's agency. Different instructors have different ethics when it comes to teaching. It is a matter of personal pride to many instructors that their students will be solid divers and reflect positively on them. For others, they just want to collect the fees. Students often have difficulty distinguishing between the extreme ends of the spectrum. Normalization of deviance places into that, as they've been diving that way "for decades" and have "thousands of dives".