There's no need to roll tanks or wait to analyze unless you are mixing trimix.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
At the risk of introducing something to actually think about, if most of the dives are in the 30-70' range, why are we talking about 32%? Those dives call for 40%, not 36%. And 40% is not a foreign substance in SoFL.
Most of the charters I am familiar with aren't going to give you the extra bottom time you'd gain with a 40% mix.
So true. But extended bottom time is but one of many reasons to use nitrox. From the question let's assume that this diver is a bit inexperienced and not likely to have a consumption rate that would allow dives beyond 60 minutes at 60'. Nothing wrong or surprising about that! But is that a reason to use a thinner mix? Of course not. A 40% mix still means that, compared with 21% or 32% or whatever, the diver still has substantially less nitrogen in his or her tissues after the dive. And that is reason enough to understand how to use nitrox!Most of the charters I am familiar with aren't going to give you the extra bottom time you'd gain with a 40% mix.
Here is a shop in South Florida with banked EANx 32, 36, and 40, all for the same price.
Home - Go Dive Florida
So true. But extended bottom time is but one of many reasons to use nitrox. From the question let's assume that this diver is a bit inexperienced and not likely to have a consumption rate that would allow dives beyond 60 minutes at 60'. Nothing wrong or surprising about that! But is that a reason to use a thinner mix? Of course not. A 40% mix still means that, compared with 21% or 32% or whatever, the diver still has substantially less nitrogen in his or her tissues after the dive. And that is reason enough to understand how to use nitrox!
True, but let's not ignore the obvious reduction in N2 when using 40% instead of 32%.I agree the reduction in absorbed nitrogen is justification to use EAN as a safety measure, but I think that is gained with the typical 32-34% mix.
No debate necessary taymag! Nice to hear that you posed the question because you were thinking things over as a result of what you were learning in class! Keep learning. Good dives to you (even if they are on air)!Thanks again for the answers. I'm not going to get into any kind of debate here, I was just simply asking a question and received mostly helpful answers. Regardless of clearing it up in the nitrox class book last night, I still am glad I posted this cause I still learned a few things/opinions and that's why I am here in the first place
Thanks again for the answers. I'm not going to get into any kind of debate here, I was just simply asking a question and received mostly helpful answers. Regardless of clearing it up in the nitrox class book last night, I still am glad I posted this cause I still learned a few things/opinions and that's why I am here in the first place