Well..it sounds logical and it seems to make sense when you think about it, but it does not really work that way in practice.cummings66:What a deal, if it's dry.
One thing I would add is buoyancy issues. With a Neoprene dry suit you have compression issues and will tend to carry more lead to offset the neoprene, crushed is not the same that way. A trilam doesn't have this issue either.
So, you'll find a trilam dives very similar to the Viking you have now and a 6 or 7mm neoprene suit dives differently due to compression.
Everyone understands neoprene "wet suit" compression, but many divers seem to miss the point that the air in your drysuit is subject to the same pressure increases and is in fact more compressible than neoprene.
In my experience, I use much thinner underwear with a 7mm neoprene suit than I use with a trilam. And the larger volume of air in the trilam's thicker insulation is a lot more compressible than the neoprene in the neoprene suit fabric. Consequently, what I have found is that I have to add less air less often on descent with a neoprene suit.
I do agree there is a significant difference in how the two suit styles "feel" during a dive however as the neoprene suit is much more comfortable and stable in the water.