I'm debating getting attached boots replaced with either neoprene socks or smaller boots to fit better. I have searched and found a number of threads on the subject.
I saw several posts from different that all boiled down to something like this: I have two drysuits. For shore dives with a rocky entry, I use a suit with neo socks and rock boots over them. But, for boat dives, I use a suit with Turbo soles (a specific brand of attached boots, I think) because I don't like the limited flexibility of rock boots.
So, the question I have is: Why wouldn't you just have neoprene socks on your drysuit and use rock boots for rocky shore dives, and use a wetsuit bootie with a sole like the Turbo soles for boat dives? Maybe even one size bootie for warmer water with less layers of socks and a bigger size bootie for cold water with more layers of socks?
I realize that some people prefer an attached boot for the convenience of donning and the fact that you can't take your drysuit and forget the boots if they are attached. So, other than that, why would you buy two drysuits just to have an option that doesn't limit flexibility like rock boots? Or IS that the reason?
I'm leaning towards getting socks put on my drysuit. It seems like that would let me use whatever amount of insulation is appropriate for conditions while still having a snug fit, and whatever amount of ankle support is appropriate, all by just having a couple of different pairs of boots/booties and fins to fit. Worst case, 2 pairs of rock boots and 2 pairs of booties for every combination of warm/cold water and boat/shore entry. Plus probably 2 pairs of fins (which I already have anyway). One L and one XL.
But, I've only owned or used a suit with attached boots, so I fear that I don't know what I don't know about going with attached socks instead of boots.
Thanks for sharing your wisdom.
I saw several posts from different that all boiled down to something like this: I have two drysuits. For shore dives with a rocky entry, I use a suit with neo socks and rock boots over them. But, for boat dives, I use a suit with Turbo soles (a specific brand of attached boots, I think) because I don't like the limited flexibility of rock boots.
So, the question I have is: Why wouldn't you just have neoprene socks on your drysuit and use rock boots for rocky shore dives, and use a wetsuit bootie with a sole like the Turbo soles for boat dives? Maybe even one size bootie for warmer water with less layers of socks and a bigger size bootie for cold water with more layers of socks?
I realize that some people prefer an attached boot for the convenience of donning and the fact that you can't take your drysuit and forget the boots if they are attached. So, other than that, why would you buy two drysuits just to have an option that doesn't limit flexibility like rock boots? Or IS that the reason?
I'm leaning towards getting socks put on my drysuit. It seems like that would let me use whatever amount of insulation is appropriate for conditions while still having a snug fit, and whatever amount of ankle support is appropriate, all by just having a couple of different pairs of boots/booties and fins to fit. Worst case, 2 pairs of rock boots and 2 pairs of booties for every combination of warm/cold water and boat/shore entry. Plus probably 2 pairs of fins (which I already have anyway). One L and one XL.
But, I've only owned or used a suit with attached boots, so I fear that I don't know what I don't know about going with attached socks instead of boots.
Thanks for sharing your wisdom.