New drysuit divers are notorious for having poor buoyancy control. With the proper choice of a dive site, the worst that can happen descent-wise is that the new drysuit diver becomes a dirt dart. No harm done there, provided that the diver was able to equalize properly during the unplanned descent.
Whether the uncontrolled ascents occurred on the same dive or on different ones is immaterial, in my opinion.
One uncontrolled ascent (too rapid?) from a depth of 90 ffw is reason enough to stop diving for the rest of the day.
The responsibility resides with me, not the instructor. Typically I outlast this instructor in terms of air, he knows this, and so do I. The drysuit experience killed my air. He finished the dive with 1600psi, i finished, well on a pony. Mind you, at no point was I surprised at the level of my air. I constantly check my watch, and I signaled the instructor at 700, and at 300 is when we aborted. Problem is that at 300 is also when I had the second uncontrolled ascent and that killed my air to 100 psi.
You are accepting responsibility for the LOA situation. That's fine. However, I'm left wondering why the instructor didn't begin the ascent immediately when you signaled to him that you had 700 psi. Bear in mind that I have no idea at what depth you signaled 700 psi. I also don't know what pre-dive gas planning was agreed upon beforehand.
What turn pressure or ascent pressure did the instructor specify during pre-dive planning?
Anyhow - this thread is not about passing blame. I accept full responsibility for the mishaps. For the instructor, this is the first time, in all his diving career, that he has had mishaps with his students - and that's a pretty long career.
Hopefully, this incident was a wake-up call to him.
If he really has had a long career teaching students, I'm actually more than a little surprised that this was the "first time" that he had a mishap with a student. Even if an instructor does
everything correctly (e.g., chooses appropriate dive site for instruction, monitors students' gas supplies carefully), strange things can happen. By exercising good judgment, it mitigates the risk somewhat of bad things happening. It won't remove the risk altogether, though.