reubencahn
Contributor
BigBoB:Down to about 175ft it stays 83-85 degrees. Below that it drops a bit but I have never been uncomfortable in a 3mm.
Sounds like heaven.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
BigBoB:Down to about 175ft it stays 83-85 degrees. Below that it drops a bit but I have never been uncomfortable in a 3mm.
Ok that makes some sense.reubencahn:I think the DIR solution would be AL80 stages.
Lane Zimmer:3) What kind of dive is a person doing where you need that much gas? If they're doing a dive that requires that much, they're more than likely going to need to do a significant amount of deco. A drysuit is a better option considering the amount of exposure for such a dive. If someone needs that much gas for a little 100ft dive, then a treadmill would be a good option.
Albion:Ok that makes some sense.
Why are you thinking im talking about 100ft dive, i am in the tropics i dont need more than a 3mm suit, even for a 180 foot dive with total time in the water 60-70minutes, like i said think outside the box you are just thinking about this from your point of reference.
BTW Its around 81-82 at the bottom, and over a 100 on deck, I would be cooked before getting in the water.
Albion:Why are you thinking im talking about 100ft dive, i am in the tropics i dont need more than a 3mm suit, even for a 180 foot dive with total time in the water 60-70minutes, like i said think outside the box you are just thinking about this from your point of reference.
BTW Its around 81-82 at the bottom, and over a 100 on deck, I would be cooked before getting in the water.
It was pretty clear to most peopleOtter:Pretty clear to me.
Ok so I'm bordering between a troll and devils advocate here, but it is a smug answer which explains nothing, what problems?Otter:"Divers using dual BCs have experienced an array of problems....There is never a need for "redundant buoyancy".....The DIR approach avoids the use of dual BCs..."
Stick to the Devils advocate, I like you better that wayAlbion:Ok so I'm bordering between a troll and devils advocate here, but it is a smug answer which explains nothing, what problems?
Otter:"Divers using dual BCs have experienced an array of problems....There is never a need for "redundant buoyancy".....The DIR approach avoids the use of dual BCs..."
Doing it Right: The Fundamentals of Good Diving p 70-71
Pretty clear to me
Jason B:Serious question here .
I thought part of the DIR philosophy was to not do something because you are told, but to understand the reasoning behind it. So where is the reasoning behind it? Saying Divers using dual BCs have experienced an array of problems doesnt address the whys of anything.
Jason