ajduplessis
Contributor
Dive plans and video footage I bet will never be made available.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Dive plans and video footage I bet will never be made available.
---------- Post added August 17th, 2015 at 07:38 PM ----------
A ScubaBoard Staff Message...
This forum is for accident prevention. The methodology is action based. The essential question: What actions led to the mishap? The answers: the actions that will prevent a like mishap in the future.
Actions... not attitudes, or egos, or personality, or character or even experience.
Actions.
---------- Post added August 17th, 2015 at 06:18 PM ----------
There is no need to criticize the deceased diver to find out what the diver did that caused the mishap. Nor is there any need to get all wound up trying to figure out why... the "why?" just doesn't matter, so long as the *action* that caused the mishap is properly identified and isn't repeated.
There was a picture from the supporting dive op in the original thread in tech diving. It was a LOT of cylinders.Does anyone know what volume of gas he planned to take? I show MASSIVE amounts of gas to spend even a few seconds at that depth.
Exactly. Kim had her instructor with her the whole dive, and when we did something similar a year later, we had a buddy with our diver. The whole dive."Buckley said the physician had far surpassed his trainers - whose highest-rated level is at 65 meters, or about 215 feet"
OMG - that is pathetic!
Exactly. Kim had her instructor with her the whole dive, and when we did something similar a year later, we had a buddy with our diver. The whole dive.
stcroixscuba:. The anchor was set back in March so it's probably pretty well imbedded.