Do you log ‘gear test’ dives?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

A few weekends ago I did a 1.5 hour dive at average depth of 20 circumnavigating the entire quarry at Juturna with my rebreatther buddy looking for possible drop off locations to deeper water and just for the fun of it. He is getting his cold diving exposure soon... honestly one of the most relaxing dives i have ever had. Last weekend he lent me his scooter and I proceeded to spend 45 minutes zipping around the quarry and doing nascar style circumnavigations of the platforms. The looks on the students faces was hilarious. I did not delete the dives off my petrel log so I guess they will get uploaded the next time I choose to sync it.
 
Some of my 10 minute, shallow, gear checkout dives have more notes than a few of my 1+ hour ocean dives. The journal notes help me remember details I want to remember. Seems that’s the whole reason for a logbook anyways.
 
It is up to the individual to choose what to log. The question you need to ask yourself is why you are keeping a log. I stopped habitually logging dives a long time ago; I have enough logged dives to meet the requirements for most courses, and I am not interested in bragging about how many dives I have done, or how long I have spent underwater.

I do still have a log though, but I only tend to use it if there is something worth noting. This could be details of a specific site I may find useful in the future, or something like weighting for a different equipment configuration. Equipment checks seem like a worthy reason to me.

Numbers of dives, or bottom time isn't always important. I remember a particularly bad dive when I was a relatively new diver. I had about 40 dives at the time and had recently completed Rescue Diver. I was diving with two Divemaster trainees, both of whom were trying to notch up the 60 dives needed to be signed off. One was an aspiring stuntman (now working in the business), and the other an aspiring instructor. To get on the UK stunt register, you have to reach a certain standard in sports of your choosing, and DM ticks one of the boxes; he told me he would dive now and again for fun, but did not intend on working as a DM. I had dived with him before and always felt comfortable.

The other guy was a bit of an arse; he had a small number of dives more than me, but all in the same training quarry. His rush to be a pro rather than focus on his own diving skills worried me. When we discussed the plan, they wanted to kit up, jump in and dive for 20 minutes. They would then surface, float around for a bit, then do a second 'dive'.

I tried to talk them out of it, but for them it was all about getting the numbers. I made the point that as well as logging the number of times you have ascended and descended, you are also logging the number of times you have kitted and de-kitted, performed buddy checks, and entered and exited the water.

Their plan did not go as intended as the aspiring instructor's air consumption was horrendous; I also discovered he was not the diver he thought he was. Fortunately they canned the idea before we got in the water again. The second dive didn't last long - after little more than five minutes, he panicked and tried to bolt to the surface. At this point I had to take control and managed to calm him enough to make a normal, controlled ascent, and get him out of the water.

This dive did not meet the 20 minute rule that many seem to work to, but there was more stuff worthy of noting from that short dive than many long, incident free dives; what went wrong, how I dealt with it, what I learned, and most important - a note to give this guy a wide berth in future!
 
I'll stop logging dives when I become a perfect diver, and I'm not counting on that happening in one lifetime.

Until then, my dive log will contain the basic information of the dive, the main thing(s) that went wrong, why, if/how I dealt with it during the dive, and if/how I can fix, prevent, or better handle it on future dives. That means that if a dive is imperfect, I'll log it regardless of the numbers involved.
 
I keep notes - gear, buoyancy, trim, results, todo's, etc - on most all of my dives, though sometimes I forget on pool sessions. I don't count the pool toward my total dives. But if you asked how many times I've assisted and on what, it would be a good number to know.

Dive count gets fuzzy.

I switched gear and my last six dives were shakeouts at the Breakwater in Monterey. I count them. But two were under 13', all averaging under 17', swells were 1-2' or less, vis about 20'. Half the dives I was just using the Breakwater as a more interesting pool while I shook out gear. The other half were that plus mild exploration. Of course, they were all over an hour, half of them over 90 minutes, and the new gear is switching to a sidemount rig. I didn't count a 'lets check that I wouldn't drown' buoyancy and trim check with a single sidemount LP27 and a 5 minute 9' bottom time 30 minutes before the first of them.

How do these six mostly less that 20' dives compare to my doing the same 30' dive 20 times lead by the hand? Fuzzy. Makes 'I have X dives' only a crude measure.
 
I would be careful of calling quarry dives training dives. I have been diving cold , low viz quarry water for near a decade and they can be some very demanding dives. Most of my Cariban diver friends who have hundreds of dives in the 100-130 foot range in caribean water do not dare follow me below 70 and it has little to do with the temps. Each type of diving presents its challenges. In Caribean water its current, fish with teeth, getting on and off the boat, etc. In quarries its low viz, entanglement, temps, etc.
 
This dive did not meet the 20 minute rule that many seem to work to

This 20 minute rule you speak of is a myth that comes from part of a standard for the length of a training dive. It has nothing to do with a requirement to log an open water dive. You could log five minute dives to meet the number of dives requirement and there is nothing written that says you can't. Some agencies also require a certain amount of bottom time to eliminate the practice known as "tea bagging".

That being said, this myth of the 20 minute time to count as a loggable dive is so widely (mis)known that is has become an unwritten standard.
 
Anything less than 20 feet for 20 mins is not a dive. I also personally don’t log any of my dives where I am training or teaching a class. Sometimes when I test equipment like a new camera I actually end up doing a long dive and then I will log it. This allows me to make notes for myself for the next time I use that piece of equipment. Hope that helps.
So fish farm divers who go down 30feet for 5 mins at a time aren’t diving, even though their title is diver.

A dive is a dive. If I was an instructor, I’m not sure if I would count training dives but other than that, if you go down using scuba gear, you are diving. A dive is a dive.
 
Some agencies also require a certain amount of bottom time to eliminate the practice known as "tea bagging".

Uh...is "tea bagging" the correct term, or "sand bagging"? Cause those have 2 entirely different definitions where I come from.
 

Back
Top Bottom