Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
That's about when it happened to me. Kind of disconcerting at first.
I don't see the need for an SPG with AI doing no stop diving, unless you're pushing recommended rec. depth limits, but just a tip...
Do you know.. I was going to list the places I got them but figured the post was long enough, so I was going to wait until somebody asked. And that's you!
I'm not really seeing that. (Pun intended).
Here's a side by side comparison, my old vs new gauge. There's a lot of "dead white space" on the large gauge. On the smaller button, I have no problem seeing the needle and the increments between the 1000 marks- the accuracy difference will be negligible as will the readability in the rare case I might need it some day in the event of a failure of my AI computer.
If you are going to use button gauges, the DGX ones are good quality and less expensive ($15).
Mini-SPG, { 1 in | 2.5 cm } Face
You can get a much more compact SPG than the one in your picture.
If you didn't have AI, would you dive with 2 SPGs on your rig? Probably not. If you don't need redundant SPGs, then why does the fact that your SPG is a wireless transmitter suddenly mean that you do?
Also, for backup to my AI, I carry a backup AI transmitter.
I've seen a lot more SPG spools fail than dive computers. And I've seen a lot of SPGs reading 200-600 psi when not even attached to a tank. Sure, take care of the spool and all is fine. But people don't so that...they wait for it to fail. It is kinda like waiting for an avocado to ripen....not yet, not yet, not yet, NOW, too late.Because dive computers are more prone to failure than an SPG?
If you look back in the thread I posted a picture of 3 different gauges, the one you recommend is one of them. The one I put on my rig is the same size.
Because dive computers are more prone to failure than an SPG?