the MK25 has a 5th port on the the end of the turret. since it rotates around the axis, that would count as fixed.
What is the overall likely hood of a ScubaPro MK25 having any catastrophic failure? All possibilities of the regulator failing on a dive? Extremely low. A cheapo Ali Baba first stage with no swivel isn't going to be more reliable than the MK25 because they didn't include a swivel. It was just a cheap piece of cr*p without a swivel. I would buy the regulator based on the overall evaluation of the equipment, rather than it's PERCEIVED flaw by a someone on ScubaBoard.
If you can google regulator failures and find reviews that describe first hand accounts in either the real world or under test conditions that show it as a failure point, I wouldn't worry. I would focus on the overall performance of the product.
A Mk25 has a rotating turret, as did the MK20, MK15, MK10, and MK5. It is not fixed. If someone wants a 5th port and a fixed turret they can buy an Atomic Z2, which is a high-performance regulator. I have no idea where you are getting Ali Baba from. However, the same companies that sell on Ali Baba are OEMs for some well-regarded products on SB.
The Scubapro MK21 has an option for a 5th port and did not use a rotating turret, in the past Scubapro also made versions of the MK5 and MK10 (MK6? and MK9?) that had a 5th port and a non-rotating turret. Evidently, some divers do prefer a non-rotating turret, but most don't or are indifferent. Given the fact that these regulators were not very popular.
When I responded to your post, I mentioned that I remember maybe 2
incidents were divers said the turret came off. I didn't remember what brand of regulator (MK5) it was. What I do remember was it was attributed to bad servicing not a design flaw. Given the MK25 is the last model in a long line of Scubapro turret regulators I would hope all the bugs have been worked out. So I agree the probability of failure in a properly serviced regulator is low.
I never said that a rotating turret is a PERCIEVED flaw, and I never said it was a failure point either. I understand the DIR/Hog philosophy and agree with it for technical diving. However, for recreational diving some recommendations are overkill. I also agree that some divers take failure point analysis to the extreme.