Exactly. And having been involved in the preparation of official recommendations from professional organizations, I will tell you that there is a lot of concern about the limits of applicability. Because you are putting the stamp of the organization's authority on the document, you want to be sure that it is only used in the situation for which it was designed.
One of the published indications for emergency thoracotomy is cardiorespiratory arrest, and this procedure has a survival rate of up to 60% in some series. Nevertheless, it is not appropriate for an unresponsive diver in the water. Context matters.
Very much so. While cardiopulmonary arrest is an indication for open thoracotomy, I can count on one hand the number of chests I’ve seen cracked in my ED in the last 10 years.
Admittedly I work in community hospitals, not trauma centers, but just because you can open a chest doesn’t mean we will. When a resuscitation becomes futile no additional interventions will make one lick of difference.
Unfortunately that futility sets in really quickly - especially in out of hospital arrests, even more so when ALS providers are not quickly (less than 10 minutes) available.
Way back at the beginning of my medical career (late 90s) I was taught the arrest you prevent is the arrest you save. In the last 20+ years not much of that has changed.