DiverHowie
Registered
Hmmmm....
I don't think this is such a simple issue. The thing that's really important in a bailout situation is that you want assurance of maximized usefulness of the gas that you have in your pony. Now - IF YOU DON'T EVER GO BELOW the MOD for the nitrox mix in a pony (say 100 feet for either po2 of 1.4 or 1.6) and your Nitrox mix is 32% you are carrying a third MORE oxygen in your bottle for the bailout ascent if you have the nitrox. As bailout is a high stress situation I would think getting a richer O2 mix just might give that extra margin of breathability (SAC reduced) and degassing improved at a possibly shorter safety stop. So what's the problem with using the right nitrox mix in THIS situation then - it covers most "normal" sport diving? If you're going deeper than 100 feet you need a big pony, if below 100 you wan't the most you can get from a modest size one - say 13 cuft. I'm interested if there are better counterarguments to this please????
I don't think this is such a simple issue. The thing that's really important in a bailout situation is that you want assurance of maximized usefulness of the gas that you have in your pony. Now - IF YOU DON'T EVER GO BELOW the MOD for the nitrox mix in a pony (say 100 feet for either po2 of 1.4 or 1.6) and your Nitrox mix is 32% you are carrying a third MORE oxygen in your bottle for the bailout ascent if you have the nitrox. As bailout is a high stress situation I would think getting a richer O2 mix just might give that extra margin of breathability (SAC reduced) and degassing improved at a possibly shorter safety stop. So what's the problem with using the right nitrox mix in THIS situation then - it covers most "normal" sport diving? If you're going deeper than 100 feet you need a big pony, if below 100 you wan't the most you can get from a modest size one - say 13 cuft. I'm interested if there are better counterarguments to this please????