- Messages
- 20,663
- Reaction score
- 15,187
- # of dives
- I'm a Fish!
@KevinNM you'll have to ask @Dsix36 or @PfcAJ as I haven't done either of the dives. Hence why I didn't comment on whether it was enough or not.
I still won't comment on whether it was enough, because by their calculation it may have been, and/or should have been, but these are my thoughts.
The 4 man team went farther back with the same amount of bailout/diver. If the other passage is free of restrictions, is scooterable the whole way, and with 4 guys instead of 2, you could argue that you have less need for bailout and I'd be OK with that. You can go into a team bailout scenario if you have to, and should be on the trigger most of, if not the whole time. Depends on how they did their dive plan, if it was not based on having to kick out because of the backup dpv, if it was assumed that it should be enough for one diver but if it really hit the fan then you can go to team bailout etc. etc. I wasn't there on either of the dives and don't know how either of them planned it.
By my math the 2 diver team had enough to kick out if they didn't get stuck somewhere. One of the things that I feel is rarely discussed in OC bailout planning is time to correct incidents. If you have enough to kick out and you are using a slightly elevated sac rate, and a slow kick speed, then you should be fine. What happens if you get caught in the line and tied up for 2 minutes trying to untangle something? What happens if you get stuck somewhere, lose the gold line, silt out etc. At 100ft, even 5 minutes isn't likely to kill you from running out of gas, but 5 minutes at 300ft is a LOT of gas... They could also have had a similar team bailout strategy. One of the guys may have been more experience at navigating restrictions, so if there was a major problem, they could have agreed upon team bailout instead of carrying a lot more bottles that would have impeded their ability to move around etc. Lots of ways to skin that cat
I still won't comment on whether it was enough, because by their calculation it may have been, and/or should have been, but these are my thoughts.
The 4 man team went farther back with the same amount of bailout/diver. If the other passage is free of restrictions, is scooterable the whole way, and with 4 guys instead of 2, you could argue that you have less need for bailout and I'd be OK with that. You can go into a team bailout scenario if you have to, and should be on the trigger most of, if not the whole time. Depends on how they did their dive plan, if it was not based on having to kick out because of the backup dpv, if it was assumed that it should be enough for one diver but if it really hit the fan then you can go to team bailout etc. etc. I wasn't there on either of the dives and don't know how either of them planned it.
By my math the 2 diver team had enough to kick out if they didn't get stuck somewhere. One of the things that I feel is rarely discussed in OC bailout planning is time to correct incidents. If you have enough to kick out and you are using a slightly elevated sac rate, and a slow kick speed, then you should be fine. What happens if you get caught in the line and tied up for 2 minutes trying to untangle something? What happens if you get stuck somewhere, lose the gold line, silt out etc. At 100ft, even 5 minutes isn't likely to kill you from running out of gas, but 5 minutes at 300ft is a LOT of gas... They could also have had a similar team bailout strategy. One of the guys may have been more experience at navigating restrictions, so if there was a major problem, they could have agreed upon team bailout instead of carrying a lot more bottles that would have impeded their ability to move around etc. Lots of ways to skin that cat
Last edited: