I wasn't aware that the entire volunteer recovery divers were on the exec... interesting.What's the difference between those two, again?
The "org" is made of people, and those people happen to be the recovery divers.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I wasn't aware that the entire volunteer recovery divers were on the exec... interesting.What's the difference between those two, again?
The "org" is made of people, and those people happen to be the recovery divers.
This is endemic of all of scuba diving. In fact, the cave diving community is better at providing information about diving accidents than pretty much any other facet of the diving industry. I've learned to stay out of discussions about diving accidents because of the visceral responses that typically come from wanting to find out what happened. I understand it ... these are often friends, relatives, or casual acquaintances we want to protect. But the priority isn't about learning, or figuring out how to prevent the same from occurring elsewhere. It's more often about protecting reputations ... or a dive op or dive site that people don't want to see jeopardized.Sadly, these divers are dead. We now must also look to the living. When an accident occurs in aviation, there are reports and investigations. These are readily available and used in by the aviation community to make it a safer endeavor. There is a lot of discussion on why the accident happened long before the reports are out. The FAA has even issued directives without complete reports to facilitate safety. Diving has no such thing. The ICURR has some recovery reports but little information. In the Technical side of diving, information is critical. Our methodologies, training and skills revolve around lessons learned from previous experiences, incidents, accidents and deaths. With no formal method of releasing investigation reports into diving accidents, we are left only with supposition and internet 'expert' opinion. To move safety forward in our sport, we must not shy from deep discussions on accidents such as this one. We must not protect the ‘memory’ of the dead to the detriment of those living that may benefit from information gleaned from an accident. A goal of an investigation into any accident is to prevent or reduce further accidents by promulgating information learned. We currently rely on information from private industries and organizations such as DAN or ICURR for what little information we will get. Typically, these Internet forums are our best source of information both valid and invalid.
There's nothing to learn. Diving's a risky activity. There are ways to mitigate the risks. From everything I've read it appears these two divers were well trained, well experienced, and well prepared for this dive. They did everything they were supposed to do and they still died.
Sh!t happens ... that's all the lesson we're ever likely to get.
... Bob (Grateful Diver)
Ugh. There's for SURE stuff to be learned and there's more than enough facts reported to learn those things.
Maybe for you, but us regular divers don't understand what the hell happened, and we (I've) been told to be patient. Are you implying we have gotten all we are going to get?Ugh. There's for SURE stuff to be learned and there's more than enough facts reported to learn those things.
Maybe for you, but us regular divers don't understand what the hell happened, and we (I've) been told to be patient. Are you implying we have gotten all we are going to get?
Maybe for you, but us regular divers don't understand what the hell happened, and we (I've) been told to be patient. Are you implying we have gotten all we are going to get?