Hi Robbie,
So as to prevent possible confusion from other posts, obviously patches are not patches are not patches.
It makes no more sense to compare the possible implications of nicotine and scopolamine patches for scuba than to do so for nitroglycerine and estrogen patches. They're all quite different. Nicotine and scopolamine patches are used for completely different purposes and have different methods of action, half-lives, side effect profiles and risks for diving.
One thing they do share, however, is that there is no compelling reason, theoretical or otherwise, to suspect that the pressure at depth forces a higher dosage of the medication through the patch.
DIR often imposes practices that appear based more on the personal preferences of its gurus or tenuous theorizing than on medicine or science. There is no compelling reason why a diver not experiencing worrisome topside adverse reactions to nicotine replacement should manifest them during recreational scuba.
As is stated in the article, with very deep scuba on air or with nitrox diving, nicotine replacement raises the theoretical concern of increased oxygen toxicity risk due to the stimulant effects of the drug. While this very likely is an insignificant risk at best, at the least nicotine replacement would not appear to pose any greater risk than would the regular use of cigarettes during a dive trip. Smoking divers generally do not temporarily cease tobacco use 24-hours prior to scuba.
In any event, understanding the real issues and applying good common sense should be of much assistance in making the decision regarding diving while on nicotine replacement.
This is educational only and does not constitute or imply a doctor-patient relationship. It is not medical advice to you or any other individual and should not be construed as such.
Regards,
DocVikingo