Diver who went missing off Lyme Regis sparking huge search operation is fined

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

The headline is misleading. The fine was for violating UK coronavirus lockdown rules, not for the rescue. They fined both the rescued diver and his friend who was diving separately from the same boat. The friend successfully completed his dive and was the one who called for the rescue.

"The diver was reported as missing by his friend, who had also been diving from the same boat off Lyme Regis yesterday....

Both of those onboard the boat had been diving as a leisure activity and were fined by police after being brought back to shore."

[edited to include quote from article]
 
The headline is misleading. The fine was for violating UK coronavirus lockdown rules, not for the rescue. They fined both the rescued diver and his friend who was diving separately from the same boat. The friend successfully completed his dive and was the one who called for the rescue.

"The diver was reported as missing by his friend, who had also been diving from the same boat off Lyme Regis yesterday....

Both of those onboard the boat had been diving as a leisure activity and were fined by police after being brought back to shore."

[edited to include quote from article]
It’s because it’s a UK newspaper. For the local audience, it is implied. I will edit my post to make that clearer.

But part of the reason of the lockdown and the rule is to avoid putting pressure on emergency services or putting the rescuers at risk of catching Covid. UK groups about caving and diving are all repeating to not put the lives of rescuers at risk.

So it’s not totally unrelated, even though you are totally correct: they were fined for violating lockdown.
 
I didn't intend to criticize the OP, the thread title came directly from the linked article.
 
I didn't intend to criticize the OP, the thread title came directly from the linked article.
I never thought you wanted to criticise me :) (and that would be ok if you did)

I thought I would clarify because most of scubaboard is from the US and the headline is misleading without the context, like you said.
 
I tell people who insist on diving to not call EMS if there’s an incident so to not put them unnecessarily at risk. I know a nurse who got the virus from a patient and was suffering quite a bit for two weeks but fortunately lived. I have said this to friends
 
I can't read the article.

As for taking up medical resources staticitly I'm more likely to get into a car accident going to my local grocery store than anything else including diving.
 
When you consider what the various rescuers mentioned should have been doing instead of rescuing it's a huge effort for a couple of selfish decisions. Merely taking a leisure boat out of harbour was a no no.

On the other side airborn search and rescue were probably not doing much considering the restrictions but the RNLI lifeboat crew are all civilian volunteers. Other under-used responders whose usual duties are reduced have (where prudent, possible and required) been seconded to anti-covid measures.

The language of the fishermen diverted from their hard earned income is probably too extreme for the gentle folk of Scubaboard
 

Back
Top Bottom