Diver dies in Richmond, TX while cleaning water tank

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

3 man dive team has been in place for at least 3 decades. We're not going to change the industry because someone couldn't live in 30' of water. Doubtful if a diver had a light, maybe. We're used to 0 vis.

In 0 vis, it's unlikely the victim could have found the 4" rigid corrugated hose in the tank or the 2" or 3" water inlet pipe in the tank that went from floor to ceiling, to pull himself to the surface.
 
Edit* Also, the victim was wearing an AL80 and a 19cf Pony bottle. Total time from splash to fatility was less than 30 minutes. There was no evidence of a gear failure. Both bottles were empty.

That's a lot of gas in a short while. I wonder if it's possible he started off on the pony by mistake and had a freeflow on the 80 while trying to switch over after unexpectedly running out of gas?
 
I came across this thread.. and an hour later after registering, confirming, activating, etc..

I thought I'd share that I found this on the company website.

****************************************************

Statement:

Our heartfelt condolences goes out to the family and friends of Travis Muller our newest employee who died in a tragic accident Wednesday October 13th 2010.
Ron Perrin Water Technologies has suspended all diving operations until we complete all investigations to determine the cause of the diving fatality. This is our first accident since our establishment in 1997.


We take the safety of our employees very seriously, this company will suspend diving activities until our internal safety audit has been completed.


Ron Perrin
Owner
Ron Perrin Water Technologie

ronperrin (dot) com
 
I'm not willing to answer that.
As for the reporters, who knows.
I've been in the News a dozen times, they have NEVER gotten the information right.

Funniest time was when my brother was arrested for a racial shooting. He was 10, and the BB Gun he was shooting a stop sign with ricochet'd and hit a neighbor kid. No injury, no issue, but Newspaper called it racial shooting by a white guy. LOL

Usually when a reporter attempts a story on scuba, it's laughable, but the faulty regulator thing actually makes sense. I'm just saying...

And thanks for your input, BTW :)
 
These are commercial divers in dry suits full head gear, etc no contact with the water supply.

Our cleaning system uses Commercially certified divers sealed in a Dry Suit so there is no contact with the water supply. The diver is then washed down with a chlorine solution recommended by the American Water Works Assn.

I can post a link, but there's a lot of info on ronperrin(dot)com/cleaning.htm
 
These are commercial divers in dry suits full head gear, etc no contact with the water supply.

From previous reports of people who know the diver/company it sounds like it was being done on SCUBA, not a hat.
 
In 0 vis, it's unlikely the victim could have found the 4" rigid corrugated hose in the tank or the 2" or 3" water inlet pipe in the tank that went from floor to ceiling, to pull himself to the surface.


If you guys would THINK a little before you posted, or read the entire thread, I wouldn't have to type so much. Geesh :dork2:

He was in crystal clear water. HOWEVER!, when we (commercial divers) dive, it's usually in zero vis. So, we rarely have a light, because a light would do us no good. Gah! I'm not sure how many drysuit dives he's had. I'm guessing 0. It has been claimed that he told Ron Perrin that he was training to be a dive master. I don't know that for fact though.


Better to remain silent and thought a fool, then to open your mouth and remove all doubt --Abe Lincoln
 
Ok... Yah, Here's what I know about OSHA and the commercial diving industry. Then you can compare that to the article in the news...

Must be surface supplied. Must have three man dive team.


using Self contained (Scuba) is allowed by OSHA.



Title 29 CRR 1910.424

1910.424(a)

General. Employers engaged in SCUBA diving shall comply with the following requirements, unless otherwise specified.

1910.424(b)

Limits. SCUBA diving shall not be conducted:

1910.424(b)(1)

At depths deeper than 130 fsw;

1910.424(b)(2)

At depths deeper than 100 fsw or outside the no-decompression limits unless a decompression chamber is ready for use;​




Must have COMS with the surface.


COMS is only required by OSHA if using with Surface Supplied breathing gas. Doesn't say it's required for SCUBA (Title 29 CFR 1910.422 )


1910.422(c)

Communications.

1910.422(c)(1)

An operational two-way voice communication system shall be used between:

1910.422(c)(1)(i)

Each surface-supplied air or mixed-gas diver and a dive team member at the dive location or bell (when provided or required);​
 
There is a lot here that does not add up properly. Travis seems to have used a great deal of air in a very short time. And, according to the reports, he seems to have used it all. Thus, it sounds like the immediate cause of death was OOA. We've all heard of OOA deaths, but rarely when there is a second tank.

I also noticed in one of the early reports that there was mention of his mask being off. That may be a sign of a panic. But, that does not make much sense. I can see a diver going OOA and panicking and removing his mask and drowning. But, I can't see a diver going OOA on one tank, switching to a second one, going OOA on it and then panicking and pulling off his mask.

And, as far as experience, I am sorry to say that I'm not sure Travis was actually qualified to dive in a swimming pool. If I recall the posts, he had only done a few dives in 09. I would not have let him dive in a pool without a refresher course. So, no matter how easy the dive in the water tower may have been, it was beyond him. What could he have though he was doing, doing any sort of dive? And, along the same lines, I find it interesting an employer would have hired him for a diving job unless (1) the employer was told Travis had far more experience than he did or (2) the employer consciously disregarded Travis' safety.

I sure hope we can learn more about this.
 
If you guys would THINK a little before you posted, or read the entire thread, I wouldn't have to type so much. Geesh :dork2:

He was in crystal clear water. HOWEVER!, when we (commercial divers) dive, it's usually in zero vis. So, we rarely have a light, because a light would do us no good. Gah! I'm not sure how many drysuit dives he's had. I'm guessing 0. It has been claimed that he told Ron Perrin that he was training to be a dive master. I don't know that for fact though.


Better to remain silent and thought a fool, then to open your mouth and remove all doubt --Abe Lincoln

If there's no light, you simply can't see, period, no matter how "clear" the water is.
 

Back
Top Bottom