Ken Kurtis
Contributor
A question to toss into the fray: is it possible that, in an effort to perhaps limit liability and make diving more "foolproof" and easier for paying clients, some charter dive boat crews may be inadvertently taking away some of that responsibility from the diver, at least from the diver's point of view?
This is actually worthy of dicsussing as a separate thread (IMHO). I think the answer is a resonding and distressing "YES!!!" (And it was something we discussed at the previously-praised DAN Fatalities Workshop in April.)
It's really a chicken-and-egg argument: Divers are showing up less-skilled so it seems easier/safer/less-liability to lead them around by the nose and do everything for them. But they not only don't learn and improve that way, they also frequently don't realize that they're not as skilled as they think they are. And then some of them manage to become instructors. And they create more less-than-competent divers. And the downward spiral continues.
And to relate this concept back to this particular thread, from what I know of this diver's experience (the one who died at the Valiant), competence is not an issue. This diver was very well-experienced and would not fit the profile of the less-than-competent divers described above.
- Ken