• Welcome to ScubaBoard


  1. Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

    Benefits of registering include

    • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
    • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
    • You can make this box go away

    Joining is quick and easy. Login or Register now by clicking on the button

Diver buddy pinger

Discussion in 'Research and Development' started by mikerault, Sep 1, 2006.

  1. MJordan

    MJordan Angel Fish

    # of Dives: 0 - 24
    Location: Indiana
    56
    0
    0
  2. reefduffer

    reefduffer ScubaBoard Supporter ScubaBoard Supporter

    # of Dives: 200 - 499
    Location: San Diego CA
    710
    114
    43
    Something I'd been thinking about, similar but not quite the same purpose
    because I didn't envision a directional component:

    An underwater text-message transceiver. Basicly replaces (between similarly
    equipped buddies) the get-attention device (tank banger), the slate, and
    hand signals. All with higher bandwidth and lower error rate. Similar purpose
    as voice equipment, but something that might be economically reasonable
    for recreational divers in my lifetime.

    I note that the current generation of teens and young adults (not mine
    by any means, but it's a learnable skill) does TM almost as naturally as
    talking.

    Since I'm not purposing it at buddy location, just attention/communication,
    range wouldn't be as critical, although more might make it more useful.
    The technologies of buttons, lcd, and transmitter/receiver have all been
    productized already in wireless AI computers, and the latest of those
    have buddy SPG monitoring, which suggests the range is doable. And in
    a larger console-size package, you could have larger batteries and thus
    more TX power budget.
     
  3. DiveNav

    DiveNav ScubaBoard Supporter ScubaBoard Supporter

    # of Dives: 200 - 499
    Location: Southern California
    3,889
    485
    83

    IF you really have $$$ to invest you should PM me.

    I_AM
     
  4. RayJayJr

    RayJayJr Divemaster Candidate

    # of Dives: 100 - 199
    Location: Alberta
    177
    2
    18
    I'd put money in to see a protype.
     
  5. DiveNav

    DiveNav ScubaBoard Supporter ScubaBoard Supporter

    # of Dives: 200 - 499
    Location: Southern California
    3,889
    485
    83
    Deal ... but ....
    Let's define "prototype" ..... there are several stages in our development process:

    a) Technical specification - backed up by theoretical data
    b) Mathematical model / simulations
    c) Alpha prototype of PHY
    d) Alpha prototype of PHY+MAC
    e) Beta Prototype
    f) Engineering samples
    g) Preproduction samples
    h) Production release

    At which point are you interested to come in?

    Price goes up after every stage !!!

    Regards,

    AM
     
  6. mikerault

    mikerault Photographer

    # of Dives: 200 - 499
    Location: Alpharetta, GA
    2,587
    1
    38
    Let's turn this the other way, how much do you think it will require to get a prototype ready for testing dollar wise?
     
  7. DiveNav

    DiveNav ScubaBoard Supporter ScubaBoard Supporter

    # of Dives: 200 - 499
    Location: Southern California
    3,889
    485
    83
    I rather prefer to discuss this privately.

    We have already some funding, but as every CEO knows ... money is never enough.
    Nevertheless we are selective with potential investors.

    Please PM me.

    Regards,

    AM
     
  8. Grant R

    Grant R Guest

    # of Dives: 100 - 199
    Location: Puget Sound
    21
    0
    1
    I dive alot in low visibility and I spearfish too. Getting separated is easy and happens too often. The cost is however too high. I've used avalanche tranceivers, of which there are several brands available for locating your burried buddy. I was very surprised that a tranceiver doesn't exists (that I know of) for divers. I would think a reliable pointer within 200 feet would be very appealing if under $200. If divers are farther apart than that, well, they should have been figuring on a solo dive all along.

    I suppose there's always a risk of creating interferrence with microprocessors on a computer, if your also broadcasting a powerful enough signal through water that it can be received by another. I do think there is a market for a cheap (cordless) buddy locator. It would be awsome to have those computers that have compasses on them to also have a buddy pointer mode.
     
  9. matsat64

    matsat64 Nassau Grouper

    # of Dives: 100 - 199
    Location: Seattle
    175
    0
    16
    Put a good compass and a secondary SPG wireless and a mini microwave it it and I'll buy one.
     

Share This Page