When we were developing the Piranha, we came to the conclusion that risking flooding with multiple sealing surfaces was worth it for the modularity. We're using the same sealing surface as the Cuda, our most proven sealing surface. When you compare the amount of sealing surfaces on the Piranha to a Cuda or Sierra, then yes, there are a lot of potential leak points. However if you compare the potential leak points on a Piranha to any Suex, there are so few it doesn't matter. For example, an XJOY 14 has 6 potential leak points; 2 around the nose, 1 at the base of the body, 1 for the trigger, 1 for the prop shaft, 1 for the on/off switch, and 1 for the speed control. Add two more if you add the optional bypass and battery light. A Piranha P1 (comparable burntime, speed, torque) has 3; nose, body, shaft seal. If you want to go with our P3 you now have 5 leak points compared to Suex XK1 which has 7 or maybe 8.
We've also done flood testing in fresh and salt water. Flooded the body, motor, and battery compartments before we started the dive and then did a tech dive. One dive was on the PB4Y in Lake Washington, the other was a line run at Seattle's Alki Cove2. Each time the only difference we could tell was that the scooter no longer neutral and very heavy getting out of the water. Everything was fine. Nice safe dive. We dried off the components, charged the batteries, did a burn test. Same capacity as before. We're still using the flooded motor on one of our test units.
If you're in BC, haha49, I'm sure we can figure out a way to get you in the water with one and you can see how easy it is to put together and how fun it is to dive