Hi all,
Would love to hear feedback on the approach I am envisioning for managing real life multi-level long deco dives on CCR. Below is my approach and a couple of simulated examples to show how it would work in the water. Configuration is CCR with on-board oxygen; 2 AL80 tanks for diluent and deco gas.
Approach
Example 1 (dive limited by scrubber)
Example 2 (dive limited by Bail Out gas)
Keen to hear your thoughts on this approach to translate planned profiles into real multi-level ones.
Would love to hear feedback on the approach I am envisioning for managing real life multi-level long deco dives on CCR. Below is my approach and a couple of simulated examples to show how it would work in the water. Configuration is CCR with on-board oxygen; 2 AL80 tanks for diluent and deco gas.
Approach
- Calculate the bailout volume based on a square profile dive to the bottom for the square profile dive
- Calculate the Deco Time (DT) allowed on BO as DT = Total Dive Time - Bottom Time for the square profile dive
- Set one computer (C1) to conservative GF (50/60) and monitor its TTS (TTS_1) — this will limit the dive duration if all goes well and you finish the dive on CCR. It is limited by scrubber time
- Set another computer (C2) to aggressive GF (70/85) and monitor its TTS (TTS_2) — this will limit the dive duration if you need to bail out in OC and is limited by Deco time (based on available gas for bailout)
- You need to start the ascent as soon as one of two conditions happens: TTS_1+Current Dive time=Scrubber time or TTS_2=Deco Time
Example 1 (dive limited by scrubber)
- Planned dive (square profile @ 30m) with BT of 100 min (95 min on CC and 5 on OC) with Air and EAN90 both in AL80; scrubber time 180 min; diluent time on CCR 180+ min, O2 time on CCR 210 min; using GF 70/85 and ppO2 1.1, the DT=total dive time-bottom time=78 min
- C1: you need to go up when TTS_1=180 min (scrubber) - dive time until then
- Diluent and O2 are not limiting factors as both are more than the scrubber (180 min)
- C2: you need to go up as soon at TTS_2=78 min (BO)
- Scrubber, diluent and O2 are more stringent on C1
- C1: you need to go up when TTS_1=180 min (scrubber) - dive time until then
- Actual dive (multi-level @ 25-30m). After 112 min of bottom time between 25 m and 30 m, you have TTS_1 68 min (total dive time = 112 + 68 = 180 min | limiting factor) and TTS_2 44 min (TTS_2 = 44 min < DT = 78 min | not the limiting factor) so you start your ascent as you have reached the limit on C1
Example 2 (dive limited by Bail Out gas)
- Planned dive (square profile @ 60m). 60 m with BT of 26 min (21 on CC and 5 on OC) with TX 14/50 and EAN60 both in AL80; scrubber time 180 min; diluent time on CCR 180+ min, O2 time on CCR 210 min; using GF 70/85 and ppO2 1.1, the DT=total dive time-bottom time=61 min
- C1: you need to go up when TTS_1=180 min (scrubber) - dive time until then
- Diluent and O2 are not limiting factors as both are more than the scrubber (180 min)
- C2: you need to go up as soon at TTS_2=61 min (BO)
- Scrubber, diluent and O2 are more stringent on C1
- C1: you need to go up when TTS_1=180 min (scrubber) - dive time until then
- Actual dive (multi-level @ 48-60m). After 30 min of bottom time between 48 m and 60 m, you have TTS_1 62 min (total dive time = 30 + 62 = 92 min < 180 min | not limiting factor) and TTS_2 61 min (TTS_2 = DT = 61 min | limiting factor) so you start your ascent as you have reached the limit on C2
Keen to hear your thoughts on this approach to translate planned profiles into real multi-level ones.