Dive Rite Transpac vs Zeagle Express Tech as minimalist travel BC?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

turt1e

Registered
Messages
60
Reaction score
14
Location
Mableton, GA
I know, two extremes in price range. But I'm really trying to put together a very minimalist travel setup. The Transpac appears to be a bit more comfortable when it comes to the few minutes when out of the water and possibly has more room to grow, while the Zeagle Express Tech seems as though it would pack lighter and smaller. My diving is mainly resort diving in tropical warm waters in which I rarely wear a wetsuit, and aluminum tanks and weight belts are provided. I currently dive a wing back inflate BC and prefer it over jacket style BCs, otherwise I would just use the resort provided BCs and life would be simpler. I like to think that my interests may broaden out to tech/wreck/cave diving, but honestly playing fish paparazzi has kept me pretty well entertained for the past 8+ years and I don't see that changing much. Although, the whole side mount thing does have my curiosity peaked, but only in the above application.

So just seeing if there are any issues I should watch out for with either of these BCs for my intended application.

Thanks,

Paul
 
I have not used the Transpac so I can't compare the 2 in operation but based on the photos on the DR page, if your goal is to keep it to an absolute minimum then the standard ET is the way to go. Less padding, fewer buckles, fewer D rings (I have 3 on mine) and less overall weight. If your interest broadens later to tech or sidemount, your choice between these 2 is irrelevant, you will end up with another BC for that purpose anyway so that should not enter into the decision. If you really want to go minimal, try the ET with no wing, now that is the way to go minimal and the way I dive mine 90% of the time when in the Caribbean.
 
herman, thanks for the reply. Have you had occasion to use your ET with out a wetsuit? Curious if the unpadded webbing causes any discomfort while in the water. I am curious though why you think the Transpac would be irrelevant if I decided to get into tech or sidemount. My understanding on the Transpac was that it was upgradeable to just about any kind of future diving. I even came across a few posts were one member here even setup is Zeagle ET for sidemount.

Oh... you say you dive without a wing sometimes. Any concerns of what you do at the surface in an emergency without additional buoyancy available?

I'm guessing though, that from the lack of replies to this thread that the Dive-Rite Transpac and Zeagle ET aren't very popular BCDs. Maybe I should start broadening my search. I did get a suggestion for Oxycheq from my post over in the sidemount forum. Anyone dive those?
 
It's one of the half truths of the BP/wing. It's proponents tell you that it is convertible and you can swap parts around for a wide variety of diving, all of which is true however, they neglect to tell you the rest of the story. The wings are the most expensive part and swapping the parts around is a PITA, as is changing it's adjustments. Pretty much no one that swaps around much at all owns just one, they end up with one set up for each diving style so in the end it's irrelevant that they are configurable since most people end up with 2 or more of them, each set up for a particular dive style. Ask anyone who rejects this idea how many they own.

It's a BC, it's job is to compensate for buoyancy changes, it's not a surface float. I weight properly so I am at worst 2 lbs heavy at the beginning of a dive and end up 2 lbs underweighted at the end of the dive. The total amount of "compensation" I have any need for over the entire dive is 4 lbs - actually from -2 to +2 and dead on neutral at 1500psi, an amount I can easily handle with lung volume alone. I have no need for the BC to keep me or my gear floating because I am no more than 2 lbs overweighed at the start of the dive ( and 2 underweighted at the end), a very easy amount for me to keep floating with lung volume alone and in the unlikely event I need more floatation I simply drop weight and/or the gear itself. This is old school diving the way it was done before divers got loaded down with a ton of extra gear. It's not necessarily something I recommend for a new diver or one who has no clue of what proper weighting is but for a skilled properly weighted diver, its a very liberating way to dive. To be honest I really don’t buy the post on the other thread about side mount with one tank. That amount of imbalance would roll me like crazy, the only way I see around it is to offset my weights (which may well require more than I normally need) or to keep air in the bladder which will require me to be overweighed. And even then, there is no way around being off balance at least at some point in the dive as the tank swings from around 2 lbs negative at the beginning to around 2 lbs positive at the end of the dive, that 4 lbs of swing has to go somewhere.
My camera is also weighted so it’s just slightly negative (I hate a floaty camera ) so it has no impact on my weighting.

Actually, both BCs are very popular.

---------- Post added April 17th, 2012 at 10:45 PM ----------

Forgot to add, I dive mine with just a skin or Tshirt all the time with no real discomfort although I would not want to do a long hike that way.
 
herman, thanks for the reply. Have you had occasion to use your ET with out a wetsuit? Curious if the unpadded webbing causes any discomfort while in the water. I am curious though why you think the Transpac would be irrelevant if I decided to get into tech or sidemount. My understanding on the Transpac was that it was upgradeable to just about any kind of future diving. I even came across a few posts were one member here even setup is Zeagle ET for sidemount.

Oh... you say you dive without a wing sometimes. Any concerns of what you do at the surface in an emergency without additional buoyancy available?

I'm guessing though, that from the lack of replies to this thread that the Dive-Rite Transpac and Zeagle ET aren't very popular BCDs. Maybe I should start broadening my search. I did get a suggestion for Oxycheq from my post over in the sidemount forum. Anyone dive those?

Actually the DR Transpac is probably one of the more common units, it's more likely you aren't getting much response because not too many divers have experience with BOTH units...for example, I'm using DR Transpacs/Oxycheq EXTREME wings but have no personal experience with that particular Zeagle unit. (I do own an older Zeagle Ranger though)
 
i've switched around between apeks and halcyon SS BP/W lately and find that had i bought my ET first, i PROBABLY wouldn't have bought a "tradtional" BP/W set up...that being said, i am very happy with both.
 

Back
Top Bottom