Twins. Now that's a great idea. Had my eye on a couple lately, but what if one of them doesn't like to dive?
Any back-inflate bc/harness concept will put the center-of-flotation farther back than a regular 'recreational' bc, since the inflation mechanism is (by design) all at the back of the body. This is what makes them work so well underwater - they almost 'suspend' you in a horizontal position. The rec-bc, on the other hand, is designed to ensure more of the neutral or face-up flotation, just as you are used-to.
The idea is to counter-act the tendency to 'push' you face-first on the surface by trimming the weight-system location to allow a sufficient amount of neutral stability (not buoyancy) without over-exaggerating the tendancy to roll or flop. To do that, one should experiment with the location and amount of weights on the belt (or in the weight-pockets), in the trim-pockets (if so equipped), and maybe even strapped to the cylinder(s) itself. Some manufacturers even sell little trim-pockets that can be affixed to the tank-strap, that have velcro-flaps.
If you're using doubles or a big heavy steel single, however, it may not be necessary to compensate for the back-flotation, depending on how much neoprene you're trying to sink. They can be darn heavy by themselves!
Just remember that, if used as a recreational bc-rig, it's a good safety practice to allow sufficient droppable weights, in case you get in trouble and need to jettison that extra negative-buoyancy.
Now maybe if I could just get the twins to CARRY my stuff, it wouldn't matter if they wanted to dive.... (ummm, yeah it would)