No , this is not the original question and thus the limitation to one point does not make sense.
In the context of the discussion that scubagermany and I was having, it was.
None the less, is there evidence for less frequent but recurrent visits?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
No , this is not the original question and thus the limitation to one point does not make sense.
I think the point in question is that a statin is not necessarily right for everyone.
Please note that many cardiovascular events do have good survival rates if treated quickly. A heart attack that is treated properly has excellent statistics nowadays. Untreated or treated to late (because you are under water when it occurs) mortality goes up to 80%.
So for divers These things should be much more important.
Do you want to share with us what troubles you?
because fast treatment in less than 1 hour ist much more difficult to achieve if you have a heart attack at a depth of 30m."much more important for divers" exactly how?
Actually I have had that many times. It is not that I cause them but of course people come see me with chest pain and that sometimes turn out to be a heart attack.It's highly unlikely that you are going to experience a "cardiovascular event" in a doctor's office
Of course they do for every diver over 40 as is recommended by the VDST.So your dive medicals include stress ECG now? And when a 70 yo diver shows you the result a 70 yo would show, do you not clear them to dive because they are at risk of a heart attack?