The question isn’t are you uncovering Illnesses, but are you actually making people healthier, or are you medicalizing people who do not need it?
More than one RCT and meta-analysis have concluded that yearly physical exams do not reduce mortality. Just one example…
“General health checks were not associated with reduced mortality or cardiovascular events, but were associated with increased chronic disease recognition and treatment; risk factor control, preventive service uptake, and patient-reported outcomes.”
Importance General health checks—also known as general medical exams, periodic health evaluations, checkups, or wellness visits—to identify and prevent disease are extremely common in adult primary care. Although general health checks are often expected and advocated by patients, clinicians...
www.medrxiv.org
The question becomes does the additional chronic disease diagnosis benefit a patient with a better quality of life, since there does not appear to be a lifespan benefit. There must also be the costs to society of those additional diagnosis and treatment vs the benefit to the individual and society.
Additionally the question of access becomes an issue. I agree that more primary care is better than more speciality care, and that primary care is the most cost effective method of healthcare. However if we expect every adult 18-100 to get a yearly exam it is likely impossible for primary care to keep up. My own WAG is that perhaps 50% of the adult US population gets a yearly physical and we don’t have enough PCP to meet the demand without months long waits. By deciding who is truly at very low risk for chronic disease and filtering those patients out from the yearly physical recommendation we can better use the workforce of physicians we do have?
The subset of population that are divers are no different than the population at large. If an apparently healthy 22 year old wants to dive, I don’t see any reason to compel a medical exam.