- Messages
- 16,438
- Reaction score
- 5,237
- # of dives
- 1000 - 2499
Not a personal comment on the OP but an observation that occurred while reading the thread:
Shouldn't one be capable enough to do the water test without a lot of preperation or cutting corners? After all, isn't the purpose to see if one is physically capable of rendering assistance to a diver in need. I think, if someone is seriously going to become a divemaster, they should have the physical capacity to exert themselves (as in a tow or rescue) anytime ie. as a baseline of conditioning. If one stuggles with this portion of the course, should they really be thinking of taking responsibility for other divers in the water?
An interesting post. These questions are addressed in detail in my Going Pro thread "Change the Stamina tests". Am wondering if you would consider "drown proofing" as cutting corners. If so, I would suggest that the idea is to be able to float if you ever have to, without BCD, fins, etc.--no matter how you do it. As far as being able to do the tests without a lot of preparation--having not swam (basically at all) for 40 years since H.S. swim team, I had to get my swim form and swimming muscles in shape (though I considered myself--as did my doctor-- to be in very good shape for my age). This took a "lot of preparation"--for the 400, not for everything else. Also, speaking of being ready for needed tows and rescues: I couldn't agree more. But many feel these tests have nothing to do with the practical aspects of rescuing someone. I feel they should be changed to reflect that.