reaver:
Not to break the ongoing debate, but thanks for the responses! I agree with the points on learning to use the table and being comfortable with it while taking the course instead of relying too much on the computer Thanks guys!
Let me get back to the original question:
First, you should learn without a computer. Anyone who suggests that a computer is great to use instead of tables (not that anyone has done that in this thread) should be publicly flogged
Second, there are some areas where computers are very valuable:
If you are doing repetitive shoredives, i.e. multi level dives, then a computer can be a very useful tool as it will track your depth continuously. This does not mean that you should turn off your brain. Check your dives against tables (you'll most likely be way over NDL if you assume a square profile on a table and dive a multi level profile and track it with a computer). Get a sense of what some common dive scenarios and profiles are for your local conditions.
Remember that a computer has no more insight into your specific nitrogen loading than a table. Your hydration level, sleep the night before, cold water, post dive stress by hiking up a slope to get back to the car etc. are not tracked by anything. There are many theories about how our bodies react to diving, none are 100% accurate.
So be conservative no matter which method you end up using. Adjust if you dive in colder water (remember that RDP + 10 feet for cold water? Make sure you adjust your computers conservatism when diving colder water as well).
Finally, different computers give very different NDL's. Those variances are explained by the algorithms used and should give you pause before you start blindly trusting a piece of electronics with your well being.
HTH
Bjorn