Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
JulieParkhurst:All members of the RSTC are mandated to have the same basic standards not unlike building codes in construction. and like building codes The reality is that these standards are a set of "minimums" and from there is where the different agencies differ.
The RSTC minimums are excellent in their intent. Some agencies stick pretty close to the RSTC minimums while other exceed them in differing areas but none of them can fall below them in any way shape or form...
JulieParkHurst:Ultimately you cannot keep ultimate controll over the instructors you certify and for that very reason it would be impossible to lay complete liability for bad instruction or good instruction at he feet of any one agency.
Additionally some instructors take their positions very seriously while others do not. This is true of instructors trained by all agencies.
JulieParkHurst:So where does that leave us? Find a good instructor with a course you feel is right for you and don't worry about the agency they teach for. Julie
Walter:Actually, NAUI doesn't recognize the RSTC and no longer feels it necessary to set it's standards with RSTC minimums in mind. Look at their swimming requirements.
Even for those agencies who follow RSTC minimums, there's a big difference in what is required. RSTC minimums, IMO, fall far short of what is necessary to produce safe, competent divers.
Scott M:Mandating is fine in it's most idealistic approach but who is doing the checking of the instructors to be sure they are following the mandate? The agency itself is, the same one that is backing them and receiving the money from the new c-cards issued. Kinda like the fox watching the hen house. Not much credable accountability. The difference between the dive industry and the building industry is that each state and/or local municipality IS holding building contractors accountable for their actions.
In my opinion that for the most part agencies don't check up on it at all unless problems pop up. They put out fires more than anything and then they try to eliminate or control future occurance of problems by instituting new standards and procedures where applicable.
The problem is that someone new to SCUBA wouldn't know a good instructor from a bad one with nothing to compare them to, either good or bad.
Scott
JulieParkhurst:I believe that most people could choose a good instructor with no previous knowlege of scuba diving by educating themselves before they interview instructors. The reality is that almost no one interviews instructors. They simply drop by a scuba shop and sign up with whoever they set you up with and often in a rush to complete the course before their upcoming trip...
Julie
DiveTyme:Checks and balances do exist. PADI and the YMCA both send questionaires to random students (usally 1 out of 5). A breach of standards and the instructor can be suspended. Building codes and inspectors? Hard to understand and not uniform.
MikeFerrara:The agencies need to go out in the field once in a while and see what's going on and forget those stupid questionairs.
The standards need to be written in terms of measurable requirements that mean something. It is requires that buoyancy control be taught in an entry level class but we mostly see these students on their knees and or leaving a trail of silt with poor trim and finning technique. The standards require a kick to be taught but it doesn't exclude doing it with fins in the bottom. The standards may require a student to hover for a certain period of time once or twice. It should require them to hover whenever they're not going anyplace.
The standards are an absolute joke. The proof is that you can teach a really lousy class without violating them. You can argue that the intent of the standards is being violated but why don't they just state the intent? I say it's because then some one would expect them to enforce them. I know how some agencies respond to complaints of sloppy teaching. The standards are written to allow that and the releases are written such that avoiding injury is the responsibility of the student.
The RSTC is nothing but a bunch of agencies writting what they are doing into a standards (ANSII) It's the fox watching the hen house.