a. it does appear a bit nazi-ish where there seems to be a low regard for the ordinary PADI diver... almost bigotrous i feel
- Well, as a PADI student for all my diving... I have to say that in GENERAL... it's well deserved. Although PADI theories are sound and all... their process of certifying instructors isn't very reliable. You'll get some good ones and some bad ones. Attitude not considered... not all PADI instructors are good (or even safe) divers to begin with. I'm not saying ALL PADI divers suck... but a PADI cert does not mean you're a good diver.
b. it demands a whole "standardized" mindset when it comes to diving
-Yes is does... mainly for safety purposes.
c. there is a great emphasis on safety (w/c is good)
-Yup.
d. it's a whole philosophy/ ideology/ hegemonic way of thinking
so if i may ask then:
* based on this thread, is the DIR-F course more "consumer" in nature than the hard-core techy system the GUE/DIR thing was founded upon?
-No it isn't. That's IF you don't really care if you pass or not. Passing (and getting your GUE DIRF C-card) is another story... they will be more strict of course. The principles of even Tech/Cave 1 aren't 'hard core'. It's mainly an attitude adjustment... be serious when the situation calls for it... have fun when appropriate.
* is it something that i can take to better myself yet not become a cult member? what i mean here is to take the course to better my "F"... not to become a global u/w explorer or national geographic cave diver
-YES!!! This is a course I feel all divers should take regardless of skill level... just to get better and have more fun in your future dives!
* i'm overweight, enjoy a post dive smoke, enjoy a post-dive san miguel, do not have much time to do real exercise - but want to better myself... will DIR give me the finger and tell me to bugger off?
-No... unless you intend to take Cave/Tech 1 & 2... trust me... I'm not in good shape either. The swim test almost killed me! hahahaha. The only time they will tell you to bugger off is if you exhibit an unsafe attitude towards diving safety and your buddies.
* i understand the principles of the gear config, but where i come from (and with what i make mumble mumble) i have absolutely no intention to throw half my (perfectly good) gear away... much less have to procure even more expensive gear just to take the class
-although it is possible to still use some of the traditional gear... you'll find that the class will show you all the shortcomings of a lot of the gear you have. They won't force you to change it... but you will not be able to perform as well as if you had the recommended gear. As my instructor said... www.ebay.ph :lol:
* is it blasphemous to ask a PADI MSDT or OWSI to teach proper trim and bouyancy and what-nots without resorting to BP/Ws, training regimens and ideological idealism?
-No it isn't... proper trim and buoyancy are actually in the PADI training manual. The methods are all sound but after you take the class... YOU yourself will see the shortcomings of a jacket BC, floppy plastic fins... and the shortcut over-weighting methods of normal OW courses.
-GUE instructors may or may not point these failures of PADI/NAUI...etc. They usually try to let you compare for yourself. A GUE instructor can maintain proper trim and buoyancy with a stab jacket... I've even see a sad attempt at the backwards kick with split fins (it works... REALLY slow) ... they CAN be done. But that's like using a spoon to dig a pool. It's possible... but why not use a shovel?
The DIRF course is meant to improve your diving experience. Not to turn you into a robot. It's meant to give you, what GUE feels should be, the BASIC skills needed in diving. In my opinion... it gives you CONTROL of yourself underwater.
For those of you who are into cars and racing... it's like comparing the BMW Driving School... to Driver's Ed. Both teach you how to make the car move. One just shows you how to control it better.