jgarysmith:
Someone please give me the differences and pros and cons of HP and LP tanks. I purchased a HP 100 tank and after reading some posts am wodering if I made the right choice. I am diving Nitrox with it, and my main concern is bottom time. Explain the difference of a lp steel tank that has 2400 PSI ratings and a hp steel tank that has 3500 psi ratings. Any help or oponions would be appreciated.
Just so you know, the search function will deliver to you dozens of threads dealing with this subject. As somone who just moved from an HP100, and having completed many weeks of research on this very subject, I can offer the following:
1) HP tanks have great curb appeal. Smaller, lighter, favorable buoyancy, etc.
2) If you dive where you can consistently get a 3500 fill (I mean, when its cool, its 3500) then you're in great shape. For me, I dive mostly off of boats. After looking at a year in my log, I found I got one 3500 dive (my first) and the rest were about 2600 - 2800, maybe 3000.
3) With short fills, I was diving with 77 Cu ft to 90 Cu ft for 2/3rds of all my dives. Only the shop-provided 3500 fill gave me 100 Cu Ft.
I wanted more BT - so I moved to a big LP tank. Its bigger. Its heavier. But I get a little over 100 Cu Ft at 2700, and a lot more gas at 3500. If you're able to get real 3500 fills, you'll get your 100's worth.
I LOVE my HP100. I still have it. Its now my wife's cylinder and I eBayed her tiny HP80. Its a fine tank (presume PST...?) and you'll love it. The thing is watch that you get fat fills or else you're not leveraging the beauty of the thing: 100 Cu Ft of gas in its small, managable size.
Do a search. We've hit this subject a number of times.
Welcome to the board!
K