If I can see my fins then the vis is 6-7 feet. If I can't see my fins then I just I head for the pub where I can clearly see my drink.
Don't come up here, you would never leave the pub.
I judge VIS on when I would no longer be able to see my buddy.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
If I can see my fins then the vis is 6-7 feet. If I can't see my fins then I just I head for the pub where I can clearly see my drink.
This is why I solo dive.I was told - and I think it makes practical sense for most recreational dives - that its how far you can make out the presence of another diver (presumably your buddy).
So basically, I've always defined it by the lost buddy factor. This definition makes sense in California, where 20 ft viz is good diving, but 10 ft viz can make keeping your buddy a pain.
The pic OP posted looks like much better than 30 ft viz to me but I might be wrong.
There is some obvious "guesstimation" involved while sport diving; but it is often taken as a measurement from the surface, down, to a known depth.Is there an actual technical definition of visibility?
Where I regularly dive off the east coast of UAE we generally go through a layer of several meters of low vis.I haven't, but it would be s good exercise. As viz varies by depth, it would be interesting to measure viz at the surface versus 20 feet vertically and horizontally at the same depths
On a normal 28-30m dive we can have low vis from 10-20m depth then it opens up from 20m where you can see the bottom, but when you get to the bottom the horizontal visibility may only be around 5m. It's a bit weird.