I wonder what that comment says about dive training in the US to be honest. Are you not trained to be at least somewhat self sufficient? I mean criticise PADI all you want, but even a basic OW course in Australia hammered home that you need to be somewhat independent. Nobody else I've dived with from around the world seems to have those kind of expectations. I don't know where it comes from as I'm not familiar enough with the US dive industry. Thoughts?
While I admire the instructor/s you refer to, and others that try to instill same at such an early stage in ones diver training, it would be wrong to think ALL instructors in Oz are so diligent by
any means! And that's a witnessed, more than once, FACT.
If you want(ed) a guaranteed pass then the word once was (and maybe still is), go take a course on the Great Barrier Grief, or a resort in Asia (that is, if you wanted a 'free pass' so to speak and didn't even know - or care much - of the shortcomings). Not all of operators course, but
many. I had an instructor friend who worked for many years on 'The Grief' and basically if you failed a student in more than two courses where he worked, and it was one of the several major operators at the time, you lost your job (for some other obscure reason of course.) He eventually quit because he could no longer live with himself as he was passing people who were not only a danger to themselves, but others. Why, I saw with my own eyes two young ladies that had done OW in Thailand, and were doing AOW in a group with him, and they had never taken their masks off u/w, ever, nor could he get them to do so either, but still they passed.
Be that as it may, and back more or less on the training topic anyway, if not the Cocos incident, I also believe as Richard and peeweediver have inferred, that it is, in general, asking / expecting a bit (way to?) much of basic open water training for someone to come out of his / her first u/w course with
any concept of self sufficiency, save relying on the (none too reliable at times) buddy system.