drrich2
Contributor
I wouldn't be that impressed with that C.V.
And this speaks to a long-running concern that applies to the recreational diving hobby generally; whose responsibility is it to access prospective customer suitability for the diving at hand? Is it the dive op., or the customer?
No commercial dive op. is likely to pack their website and marketing materials with dire warnings about the terrible things that could happen to their customers. If you've got competitors, but your site is the only one that basically says 'You're liable to get killed diving with us,' that's not going to be good marketing. It's all the more an issue when you try to base the decision on certification level; there are divers with hundreds of dives and OW, not AOW, and yet we read accounts of dive professionals alleged to be lacking in skill. Minimums are just that, minimums. Not everyone who meets the minimum is a good candidate for those conditions. Also consider that a dive live-aboard operator is not the customer's only source of info. on the destination.
Given the investment in time and money, and the reputation of 'not so easy' diving Cocos has, I think it's reasonable to expect customers to do their homework on this destination.
If we were talking about an op. catering to cruise ship vacation divers with few & far between dives, often fresh out of OW training, that might be a different story.
Richard.