Not surprising - money seems to trump everything these days, unfortunately!The Cayman Compass posted an editorial in favor of cruise ships on Brac:
EDITORIAL – Celebrating the tourism ‘boomlet’ on the Brac | Cayman Compass
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Not surprising - money seems to trump everything these days, unfortunately!The Cayman Compass posted an editorial in favor of cruise ships on Brac:
EDITORIAL – Celebrating the tourism ‘boomlet’ on the Brac | Cayman Compass
Fair enough - it is truly a local decision and none of us can mandate what they do - we can just try to highlight impacts for them to consider.It's also seems like a bit of a "not in my backyard" situation, except for most people on here it's only their backyard temporarily for a week every few years, at most. I could also have a knee-jerk reaction, but I don't know enough about it to have a strong opinion, so I'm going to play devil's advocate here...
Do the people whose backyard it _is_ in favor it? Saying people who live someplace and would like an economic boost, or want to do (legal) things with land they may own, that they shouldn't because you'd like everything stay just the way it is - I don't think that quite flies. Yeah, people there should certainly consider what they might lose along with whatever they might gain, and it doesn't hurt to call attention to that. But there are probably ways to do some of this there without destroying the environment. I think the question and focus should be 'will they?'
In my experience this is pretty much how most of the developed world works. Most people are just getting by and have very little influence or impact on the development decisions that are made. In theory the government and their approvals process should be the gatekeeper for the regular people of what happens and what doesn't. I think that we all know that sometimes politicians are more in the pocket of the rich and influential than truly representing the desires of the masses.a fairly large population of people just living their lives while being led by the wants and desires of a very small population of "movers and shakers" with big ideas about development.