The Daphnia, even though not a marine organism, are what is currently used in many (if not most) ecotoxicological tests for toxic effects of contaminants and chemicals on living organisms. Since it would be impossible to test toxicity on each and every species, they standardized the tests for certain organisms (in this case the Daphnia) to use as toxicological essays for determining the presence or absence of toxic effets (and mainly for legal/ courtroom purposes). So obviously, the Daphnia is not the same as reef organisms, but it is an indicator that the product is quite toxic (which is obvious, or it would be useless against COTs
).
I know that the product rapidly degrades in water (which is a good thing), but how about the dead COT's lying there full of this chemical? Their tissue contains the product (it's not in contact with water yet) and they are being munched on by others. Food on reefs being scarce, I'm sure all kinds of organisms are going to be having COT Addobo for dinner after you guys pass through with your COT guns. And this will possibly affect them. I might be wrong (it wouldn't be the first time
). But I'm pretty sure this hasn't been studied yet. Until it is you are potentially negatively affecting many other species of the reef food chain.
Now as I said, I might be wrong about this and I'll gladly dispel my ignorance about it if you can point me towards any litterature covering this subject. But we can't just assume that this product, however usefull it might be for killing COTs, has no adverse effects on the reef. Removing the dead COTs would definetly be the more prudent, although not very practical, way doing things.
Just my 0.02$ No one has to agree with it...