Creation vs. Evolution

[AXL72]

dayum....reeeeoowwwwww...hissss

why on earth did this get re-opened, besides the reason to serve as a shameless plug for evolution BCDs????

 

[Gombessa]

Frankly I'm sick and tired of casting pearls before swine. If you have a real interest in knowing rather than trolling ... take a biology class.

I would thank this, but apparently it's not allowed in this thread.

 

[Thalassamania]

dayum....reeeeoowwwwww...hissss

why on earth did this get re-opened, besides the reason to serve as a shameless plug for evolution BCDs????

It was Soggy! He did it. Soggy and his new lizard.

Ok, for all of you who say evolution has not been observed... A new species of lizard, evolved within 30 years...

Lizards Rapidly Evolve After Introduction to Island

Take that, Ben Stein

 

[drbill]

Yawn... haven't those creationists evolved in their thinking yet?

 

[Thalassamania]

Other fascinating evolutionary stories:

Human line 'nearly split in two'

and

When humans faced extinction

 

[Sloth]

haha how have i missed this thread over the years? There is pure comic gold!

 

[Thalassamania]

haha how have i missed this thread over the years? There is pure comic gold!

Don't know ... lucky I guess? It'll take you two years to read the whole thread anyway.

 

[micklock]

 

[Deefstes]

LOL, I always have a good s****** (laugh) when people quote this Dr. Kent Hovind like he is some authority. I have yet to encounter any other fraud that thinks so highly of himself as this bloke. Every "academic" qualification that he holds (including his so called Doctorate) he received from unaccredited institutions and he seems to be a real joke in the scientific community.

I have my opinions on Creation and Evolution but I'd rather not get into that here as I don't have a particular appetite for the debates (read brawls) like the previous 423 pages show. Suffice it to say that have reservations with both philosophies and that I see merit in both. My point is just that this Kent Hovind is nutter (who, as a matter of interest, is serving jail time for tax evasion as I'm typing this) and I believe people do their own argument damage by quoting him. He pretends to engage in scientific debate but his arguments are very unscientific and just about all of them have been debunked by real scientists before.

 

[drbill]

As I've said before, I see no reason why the Creator and evolution are not mutually compatible. One could set the process in motion and relax as it unfolds through the workings of the second. Seems far more "energy efficient" to me.