I agree with you that a BT and depth gauge are technology but they, to me, seem a lot less susceptible to failure than a DC.
Link?
I agree with you. I’ve never said a table + BT is optimal, just that it’s an acceptable back up. I’m responding to Johnny’s passionate reaction that started after I agreed with your first post in this thread about running the dive off a computer with slate + BT as backup.
OK, I'm confused. We have plan A and plan B. People said that they liked plan A better because of reasons. You seemed to be pushing back against that, saying that we shouldn't make that case here but rather lobby training agencies to outlaw B if we really thought that A was better.
I think that @JohnnyC said it best: "There's literally no good reason in this modern age to CHOOSE a bt/slate IN LIEU OF a second computer. You can certainly choose to do so, but there's no valid argument other than, 'I choose to do it this way.' "
I’m clearly confused....where did I said that it was an optimal solution? I’m arguing that it’s an acceptable solution and that it’s not mandatory to have two computers.
Correct. No one said it was mandatory to have two computers. Who are you arguing with about that?