CNS not important anymore?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Agro

Contributor
Messages
753
Reaction score
166
Location
Zurich, Switzerland
An experienced diver told me CNS has "no importance" anymore. You may make a dive which brings you out of water at 100 or 200 or 500% or whatever CNS. It simply does not matter anymore. Never heard about that, did you?
 
An experienced diver told me CNS has "no importance" anymore. You may make a dive which brings you out water at 100 or 200 or 500% or whatever CNS. It simply does not matter anymore. Never heard about that, did you?
There are certainly plenty of folks exiting the water with over 100% CNS which is only 45mins of cumulative O2 time afterall, nevermind the CNS accumulated on the bottom and on other deco gases. Shrugs, does it matter sure, is the clock accurate? not at all
 
There are certainly plenty of folks exiting the water with over 100% CNS which is only 45mins of cumulative O2 time afterall, nevermind the CNS accumulated on the bottom and on other deco gases. Shrugs, does it matter sure, is the clock accurate? not at all
Does it matter? Sure.

Is the clock accurate? Not at all.

So does CNS% exist or does it not? Is 100% OK? Or 200%? Or 1'000%?

I do know lots of divers came out of water with 400%. Was this a calculated risk or no risk at all?

Does it have importance or not? That's the question.
 
An experienced diver told me CNS has "no importance" anymore. You may make a dive which brings you out of water at 100 or 200 or 500% or whatever CNS. It simply does not matter anymore. Never heard about that, did you?
This might be of interest:
 
So does CNS% exist or does it not? Is 100% OK? Or 200%? Or 1'000%?

Does it have importance or not? That's the question.
It has no relevance in the real world.
 
This might be of interest:
This leeds to even more questions than answers. Most of the statments contain "it seems" or similar.

Is there no scientific approach to this topic? NOAA limits were fixed may years ago and they still seem to exist. Is it really in theory only?
 
This leeds to even more questions than answers. Most of the statments contain "it seems" or similar.

Is there no scientific approach to this topic? NOAA limits were fixed may years ago and they still seem to exist. Is it really in theory only?

Paul Bert effect is real.

Threshold is variable depending on pressure, time and other factors, including individual variability, stress, physical effort,... Being under water, you get it more quickly than in a dry hyperbaric chamber.

NOA limits are empirical and are probably quite conservative. Not a bad thing considering that consequence while under water is often fatal if you aren't wearing a Full Face Mask, but there are lot of anecdotes of divers pushing past them.

I'm not aware of tentatives to determine more precise limits. Considering the risks, trying to do so would probably need better justification to get a pass from the ethical committee than just "rec and tech divers would like to have them" and that's after you've the funding.
 
It's interesting to look at the navy tables...

They do O2 at 30ft, and the CNS %s will be high...

Here is a dive to 90ft on air with the O2 deco schedule from the USN rev7
1746982923263.png

1746982943995.png
 

Back
Top Bottom