Agro
Contributor
An experienced diver told me CNS has "no importance" anymore. You may make a dive which brings you out of water at 100 or 200 or 500% or whatever CNS. It simply does not matter anymore. Never heard about that, did you?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
There are certainly plenty of folks exiting the water with over 100% CNS which is only 45mins of cumulative O2 time afterall, nevermind the CNS accumulated on the bottom and on other deco gases. Shrugs, does it matter sure, is the clock accurate? not at allAn experienced diver told me CNS has "no importance" anymore. You may make a dive which brings you out water at 100 or 200 or 500% or whatever CNS. It simply does not matter anymore. Never heard about that, did you?
Does it matter? Sure.There are certainly plenty of folks exiting the water with over 100% CNS which is only 45mins of cumulative O2 time afterall, nevermind the CNS accumulated on the bottom and on other deco gases. Shrugs, does it matter sure, is the clock accurate? not at all
This might be of interest:An experienced diver told me CNS has "no importance" anymore. You may make a dive which brings you out of water at 100 or 200 or 500% or whatever CNS. It simply does not matter anymore. Never heard about that, did you?
No disrespect meant to yourself @rjack321, but I am simply stunned that folks would think (or now think / are taught) that 1.35 is a 'relatively high' po2, CCR or otherwise, unless one was doing very extensive long duration dives.It was explicitly part of my crossover in May 2018, including adding the shutoff to the stock MAV and "breathing down" a higher ppO2 (e.g like 1.35 down to 1.2).
It has no relevance in the real world.So does CNS% exist or does it not? Is 100% OK? Or 200%? Or 1'000%?
Does it have importance or not? That's the question.
This leeds to even more questions than answers. Most of the statments contain "it seems" or similar.This might be of interest:
No disrespect meant to yourself @rjack321, but I am simply stunned that folks would think (or now think / are taught) that 1.35 is a 'relatively high' po2, CCR or otherwise, unless one was doing very extensive long duration dives.It was explicitly part of my crossover in May 2018, including adding the shutoff to the stock MAV and "breathing down" a higher ppO2 (e.g like 1.35 down to 1.2).
- Kay Dee
- Replies: 71
- Forum: Rebreather Diving
This leeds to even more questions than answers. Most of the statments contain "it seems" or similar.
Is there no scientific approach to this topic? NOAA limits were fixed may years ago and they still seem to exist. Is it really in theory only?