I didn't suggest it for myself. Christi, however, may be within the parameters of those who might be PFO closure candidates according to 2 of 3 panelists quoted in your cited article, assuming she is tested and found to have the condition.So many divers are quick to mention PFO, but the most recent DAN magazine discounts a lot of common hype about that. Anyone even thinking about PFO studies really needs to read it. Alert Diver | PFO and Decompression Illness in Recreational Divers It does not suggest PFO testing for a hit or two, and does not necessarily suggest surgery even it the common feature is found.
"Therefore, we recommend PFO closure only in specific cases: professional divers, who are required to dive with imposed dive profiles and cannot adapt their diving behavior; sport divers where no other contributing factors for DCS could be identified and who [experienced DCS after] a "low-risk" dive profile." -- Germonpre
"A commercial diver (e.g., offshore worker, dive instructor) who has experienced several DCS incidents of a type known to be associated with PFO (e.g., neurological), and who is not in a position to increase the oxygen percentage in his/her breathing gas or modify depth-time exposures [might consider PFO closure]." -- Moon
Even Bove concedes, "There have been several case reports of commercial divers who experienced repeated incidents of DCS following deep saturation dives, and the frequency of symptoms was reduced after PFO closure. So there are likely to be occasional cases where PFO closure would be warranted in a diver, but this would not apply to recreational divers."
The difference here between Christi and the rest of (most of) us is that she is a professional diver, not a recreational diver. While she often has the ability to increase the oxygen percentage in her breathing gas, we saw that this isn't always the case, and it's hard to modify dive profiles in Cozumel that are, literally, set in (reef) stone. Testing for the PFO condition, while not risk-free, is relatively benign. If results are positive, then a lot of consultation and hard thought may in order.
Yes, the article discounts routine testing for all divers, but, as Moon says, "Therefore, testing for a PFO is useful only in instances where there have been several DCS incidents of a type known to be PFO-associated, and the person cannot modify depth-time exposures or breathing gas."
Does two make "several" or should she wait until a third?