I used to skydive some 15 or so years ago in another state. One of the larger skydive operations had a de Havilland Twin Otter, a popular jump plane that could carry 20 - 22 jumpers, so you could launch a 20-way with in-air video. Nice plane, but it was an open secret that the owner/operator was cooking the log book. The Otter had a known issue with structural failure in the main wing support, and the FAA required a very expensive wing replacement after a specified number of either hours or takeoff-landing cycles (forget which). This plane was well over the limit, but not according to the log book.
That plane never crashed to my knowledge, and I think the wing was eventually replaced, but every other jump plane I was on or around eventually crashed. The last one killed everybody on board and put the local (University town) skydive operation out of business.
If you think about dive boats you've been on with "deferred maintenance" issues, the same factors are at work with any small business operating old and overworked aircraft. I'm not saying Chalk was in this mode, but everyone knows that 60 year old aircraft must have cracks in the airframe. If you aren't required to tear open a wing to look for them it might be easier to hope they aren't bad and don't go looking for problems.
Jim
That plane never crashed to my knowledge, and I think the wing was eventually replaced, but every other jump plane I was on or around eventually crashed. The last one killed everybody on board and put the local (University town) skydive operation out of business.
If you think about dive boats you've been on with "deferred maintenance" issues, the same factors are at work with any small business operating old and overworked aircraft. I'm not saying Chalk was in this mode, but everyone knows that 60 year old aircraft must have cracks in the airframe. If you aren't required to tear open a wing to look for them it might be easier to hope they aren't bad and don't go looking for problems.
Jim