Cayman and Captive Dolphins? Do you agree?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

This thread has broken down along lines of general thoughts (Are captive animal programs like zoos ever justifiable?) but little has been discussed about the particular program being proposed in Cayman.

Reason #1
The proposed facility is to be placed in a redeveloped area adjacent to the Cayman Turtle Farm. The dolphin tank is proposed to be placed in the same location where several turtle holding tanks once stood. Those tanks were devastated by the comparatively mild Hurricane Michelle in November 2001 scattering turtles all around the district of West Bay.

Moving dolphins in advance of a hurricane has been proposed. Given that the turtle pens were destroyed by a comparatively mild hurricane, consideration must be given to the idea that the proposed dolphin facility could suffer similar damage. Also one should take note that much of the island of Grand Cayman was without power for more than one month following Hurricane Ivan in 2004. Consideration needs to be made that any alternative site be capable for providing for adequate care of any dolphins for a period of time sufficient to rebuild a destroyed habitat. Additionally this alternative site should be capable of being self-sufficient with regards to power and water needs for a sufficient time until utilities can be restored.

To date I have heard no mention in local media of specific hurricane plans, other than the generalized idea that the dolphins would be moved, possibly to a resort swimming pool. I feel that no dolphin facility should be permitted to be placed at this location unless adequate hurricane plans are in place.

Reason #2
Dolphins are not in normal residence in Cayman waters. Sightings are infrequent at best, and thought to be of pods in transit. I had to ask myself why we rarely see these animals here, and I did a little research.

Generally Cayman's waters are too warm to provide a preferred habitat for the proposed species, Atlantic Bottlenose Dolphin.In an email query to Sea World in Florida, I received a reply stating that their dolphin tanks are maintained at 72 degrees Fahrenheit.

The waters of the Cayman Islands are certainly a diver's paradise. Rarely do the waters dip below 78 degrees F, and they rise to around 86 in late summer. That's at least 6 to 14 degrees above the dolphin's preferred habitat temperature. Imagine a human being immersed in water of 104 to 113 degrees constantly. They would simply overheat dramatically. As it turns out, this sort of thermal stress is cited as an adverse impact to dolphins as well.

So it seems to me that some sort of system to chill the tank water needs to be in place to afford a minimally acceptable habitat. Again I have heard no mention of plans to construct this sort of infrastructure with this particular project.

Reason #3
Effluent runoff is cited as a significant cause of damage to coral reefs. The proposed site is a short distance from a popular shore diving location in Cayman with significant nearby reef. Advancing reef degredation has been documented in close proximity to other dolphin programs, such as in Cozumel.

Publically discussed plans for the proposed site in Cayman have discussed no system of treatment of waste. Large mammals in confined quarters will produce significant quantities of waste. Left untreated, and freely mixed with incoming water as proposed, this will place a signifcant nutrient load into nearby waters. Such will only contribute to algae growth and the smothering of the reef.


There are other reasons to oppose dolhin capativity programs, but these are a few of the inadequacies of this particular program proposal.
 
Drew Sailbum:
This thread has broken down along lines of general thoughts (Are captive animal programs like zoos ever justifiable?) but little has been discussed about the particular program being proposed in Cayman.

Reason #1
The proposed facility is to be placed in a redeveloped area adjacent to the Cayman Turtle Farm. The dolphin tank is proposed to be placed in the same location where several turtle holding tanks once stood. Those tanks were devastated by the comparatively mild Hurricane Michelle in November 2001 scattering turtles all around the district of West Bay.

Moving dolphins in advance of a hurricane has been proposed. Given that the turtle pens were destroyed by a comparatively mild hurricane, consideration must be given to the idea that the proposed dolphin facility could suffer similar damage. Also one should take note that much of the island of Grand Cayman was without power for more than one month following Hurricane Ivan in 2004. Consideration needs to be made that any alternative site be capable for providing for adequate care of any dolphins for a period of time sufficient to rebuild a destroyed habitat. Additionally this alternative site should be capable of being self-sufficient with regards to power and water needs for a sufficient time until utilities can be restored.

To date I have heard no mention in local media of specific hurricane plans, other than the generalized idea that the dolphins would be moved, possibly to a resort swimming pool. I feel that no dolphin facility should be permitted to be placed at this location unless adequate hurricane plans are in place.

Reason #2
Dolphins are not in normal residence in Cayman waters. Sightings are infrequent at best, and thought to be of pods in transit. I had to ask myself why we rarely see these animals here, and I did a little research.

Generally Cayman's waters are too warm to provide a preferred habitat for the proposed species, Atlantic Bottlenose Dolphin.In an email query to Sea World in Florida, I received a reply stating that their dolphin tanks are maintained at 72 degrees Fahrenheit.

The waters of the Cayman Islands are certainly a diver's paradise. Rarely do the waters dip below 78 degrees F, and they rise to around 86 in late summer. That's at least 6 to 14 degrees above the dolphin's preferred habitat temperature. Imagine a human being immersed in water of 104 to 113 degrees constantly. They would simply overheat dramatically. As it turns out, this sort of thermal stress is cited as an adverse impact to dolphins as well.

So it seems to me that some sort of system to chill the tank water needs to be in place to afford a minimally acceptable habitat. Again I have heard no mention of plans to construct this sort of infrastructure with this particular project.

Reason #3
Effluent runoff is cited as a significant cause of damage to coral reefs. The proposed site is a short distance from a popular shore diving location in Cayman with significant nearby reef. Advancing reef degredation has been documented in close proximity to other dolphin programs, such as in Cozumel.

Publically discussed plans for the proposed site in Cayman have discussed no system of treatment of waste. Large mammals in confined quarters will produce significant quantities of waste. Left untreated, and freely mixed with incoming water as proposed, this will place a signifcant nutrient load into nearby waters. Such will only contribute to algae growth and the smothering of the reef.


There are other reasons to oppose dolhin capativity programs, but these are a few of the inadequacies of this particular program proposal.

Wow, best post of this thread.
 
The thermal issues are really a non-issue. The species can and does operate quite well in subtropical latitudes... 72F is more of an ideal. Closed system aquaria often keep their animals at optimal environmental parameters due to the higher stresses involved with most closed systems (i.e. smaller volume, synthetic seawater, psychological trauma). Higher temperatures (and salinities) also increase parasite and pathogen loading. You don't have to be so finicky with open-system tanks, so long as the environmental is reasonably close to the natural tolerances. For marine mammals, it's better to err on the warmer side (they just don't move around so much).

Chilled aquaria are incredibly expensive. Hardly anyone can afford it on large scales. There's also the risk of thermal shock if chilled animals have to be released in the event of a hurricane or long term power failure.

The best solution for holding these animals is via large fenced pens. It's been quite effective for decades at a variety of places. The downside is that the public doesn't get as much out of it, and if your local water quality is suspect (reason #3), you can do little to locally mitigate it.
 
I did the dolphin dive in Freeport, Bahamas and it was great. We were told that there's no guarantee of interaction since the dolphins are free to go to the ocean. I wrote an article abojut this dive in my website.
 
Quite a charged and riveting subject. It should incite the best and worst from each of us.

I have looked at some dolphin studies data some 10 years ago and several things became apparent almost immediately.

  • Studies on captive dolphins such as life expectancy currently are not completed adequately because there is no accompanying and relational census with the lives, numbers, and birthrates of dolphins in the wild. In other words by looking at just dolphins in the wild or just dolphins in captivity you are only seeing half of the picture. From what I understand species is a relevant factor when studying any life form and that is somewhat missing in many studies. Also many studies are made by people with bias and that as well will skew the research.
  • The knowledge of how to maintain a marine species (not just the dolphin) and the technology and procedures used to maintain a marine species has evolved so quickly over the last 35 years that a study on the life expectancy of almost every marine species will render a profile much like the data presented in previously posted links.
I do not advocate the unconditional and completely contained captivity of any animal, other than mankind, in a confined environment. I believe death is more humane under some circumstances especial where man is concerned. There are however, successful ways to show people the beauty of these creatures without a circus road show type atmosphere.

Screening
Many people don’t realize that dolphins have extremely complex mental faculties and no two dolphins are alike. The social skills of dolphins are highly advanced. They learn sex and practice it before having fully developed sexual abilities. They have social patterns and many likes and dislikes, daily routines that differ from one another. Some group together and like to “escort” ship out of the channels while others do not like any human interaction at all. From what I have seen a group may even pass judgment on one of there own and will proceed to kill or excommunicate the offender, never to be seen again. They often will fight with one another and like mankind the dolphin are probably the greatest danger to themselves in many circumstances. Selecting dolphins appropriate to the intended audience would be the first step towards making this a humane method of teaching and entertainment.

Facilities
An example was given previously on open/closed water dolphin shows. Over time I believe this will prove the most effective method. There is so much that we have yet to understand about dolphins that I would be hesitant to recommend that we stop studying them both in and out of captivity. Having places where the youth can view and learn a little about these creatures helps to create the scientists and supporters of tomorrow that will be studying and supporting the rights of dolphins in our future.
 
Were the dophins born in captivity? R the dolphins in a good habitat? R the dolphins rescue? Do the programs that support the dolphins spend a considerable amount of either time, or the money raised to educate the public about ocean awareness and habitat?

This is hardly a black and white issue.

I'm completely in favor of captive dolphins given a good environment, or a reason they are captive (rescue), and assuming that the mission of the establishment is study, research, public awareness and environmental education.

I'm completely opposed to captive dolphins as a means for profit only in the name of tourism, and the mighty dollar. I'm even more opposed to organizations who create a demand for wild dophin capture in the name of the mighty buck!!

So am I opposed to captive dolphins....depends :D
 
Theres Alot I Love To Say About Captivity Of Any Creature But My Thoughts Would Soon Turn To Rage It' Just Wrong .
Seems Theres Nothing We Can Do To Stop The Rape Of Earths Oceans,
To Bad 'cause When The Ocean Dies We Die
 
douglasville diver:
Theres Alot I Love To Say About Captivity Of Any Creature But My Thoughts Would Soon Turn To Rage It' Just Wrong .
Seems Theres Nothing We Can Do To Stop The Rape Of Earths Oceans,
To Bad 'cause When The Ocean Dies We Die

Seems you LOVE to eat, or in fact "slow cook" creatures that were kep in captivity. So you are a hypocrite.

How can anyone who would eat meat have thoughts that would soon turn to rage about the captivity of *Any Creature*??

I'm betting the dolphins in capativity are in better conditions than ANY pig that you love so well (to eat that is)
 
I say no to this program. Let the dolphins be dolphins. I am against this practice.

On a related note, what do you guys think of the whale sharks they dumped into the georgia aquarium?

-V
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/peregrine/

Back
Top Bottom