I completely agree that it is incumbent on a dive instructor to do the best job possible, and be as prepared as humanly possible to ensure that nothing bad happens. I certainly have no issue with "standards of performance". I said nothing about standards...you are putting words in my mouth that I did not say. Please don't do that.
My sole disagreement with you is your contention that ANY diver fatality that occurs in a class situation must, inevitably, be the instructor's fault. Nobody can prevent EVERY POSSIBLE thing that might happen, no matter how good a job they do, and how well they are prepared...especially when you are dealing with unpredictable humans. This is reality, not utopia. And not every accident that might occur is someone else's fault.
Look, I disagree with you. And I think that there are plenty of people who know THIS instructor (involved in this incident) who also would disagree with you.
But you are obviously dead-set in your guilty-until-proven-innocent mindset. Hence, there isn't much point in continuing this discussion.
I know it's hard to accept that someone actually disagrees with you. But please be respectful of me, and of my opinion...and refrain from saying things like:
might I suggest that you latch onto one of those hacks that have to certify you as long as you "master" the items required in the standards.
That was harsh and uncalled for. We disagree on something, on a philosophical level. That does not make me an idiot, a moron, or even a bad diver. Nor does it give you the right to speak so harshly and disrespectfully to me.
Nor does it give you the right to urge me not to be an instructor. (Which, by the way, I have no interest in doing...not because I think I can't do it, but because I already have a job.)