And at this point.... I'm done with this thread...
Jim...
This seems to be an inaccurate statement.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
And at this point.... I'm done with this thread...
Jim...
The way I now break it down is this -
If the fill was 3200 on an AL80 at 77.4 cu ft = 82.56 cu feet of air to start which is what she said and she said she she ended around 626 - 726 psi with about a 17 min total run time.
So for the descent at 60 feet per min she used 5.7 cu feet or 176 psi for a 1.5 min descent time.
For the bottom time at 90 feet (3.73 ATA) she used 72.7 cu feet or 2257 psi for 13 min bottom time.
For the ascent at 60 feet per min she used 11.3 cu feet or 352 psi for a 3 min ascent time for a total of 17.5 run time.
That would leave 23 cu feet left at 715 psi for a total run time of 17.5 mins at 1.5 RMV.
If I understand where my math was incorrect - she actually had a 1.5 RMV for the entire time or it averaged out to 1.5 RMV for the overall dive.
Wondering what the response would have been had the diver been male.
Honestly, I would say much more brutal...[emoji6]Wondering what the response would have been had the diver been male.
Looking at this somewhat differently, what should dive buddies do when a dive is thumbed and a member of the team appears reluctant to ascend?
Looking at this somewhat differently, what should dive buddies do when a dive is thumbed and a member of the team appears reluctant to ascend?
All you need to know about her dive is the average depth (67 feet)
I realize your doing this off the cuff or rounding but is (90+45)/2 the best way to come up with average depth? Honestly I use my computer for average depth - but I never really thought about it until now. My guess would have been higher than 67 feet given the time descending and ascending versus the bottom time. Is that a fairly standard approach to average depth?