Herman, I don't agree with that. It's true that a balanced 2nd is less reactive to IP differences than an unbalanced, but a 20 PSI difference would definitely be noticeable. You still have a mechanical spring pushing the seat closed; I would venture a guess that most balanced barrel-poppet regs have about a 50% downstream bias. It would be easy to measure a SP s-wing poppet for seat diameter (actually orifice interior diameter) and diameter at the balance chamber end with a micrometer and calculate the surface area of each.
A few PSI, I definitely agree, would not be noticeable on a balanced 2nd, and I also agree that the difference is likely to be much more pronounced on an unbalanced 2nd, which this one could be. In fact, I looked up the HOG website and this is the 2nd stage that came up, it does not say balanced so I would assume it's unbalanced.
HOG (HIGHLY OPTIMIZED GEAR) SECOND STAGE TECHNICAL REGULATOR BY EDGE
Maybe.... &^$%&^%$!! another project.
It may be easier to just measure the cracking pressure while varying the IP....guess I have something to do later today.